DAZN is offering Canelo half of his 35 mil guaranteed for his next fight

Majority of people thought fury had won....deal with it
But this isn't American Idol were unqualified people can phone in their vote...
No, how about you deal in REALITY. Lol why do I have to deal with a fake narrative.
You still don't get it. Its ok that a majority of people thought Fury won by points. Thats totally different than claiming Fury won and ignoring JUSTIFIABLE, official, and factual outcomes.
 
But this isn't American Idol were unqualified people can phone in their vote...
No, how about you deal in REALITY. Lol why do I have to deal with a fake narrative.
You still don't get it. Its ok that a majority of people thought Fury won by points. Thats totally different than claiming Fury won and ignoring JUSTIFIABLE, official, and factual outcomes.
Can you find the post where I claimed fury won?

Factual outcome was wilder couldn’t beat fury in two attempts in the 2nd he ended up in the emergency room after taking a massive one sided beating.

Factual outcome as a result of the above he has still only managed to beat Ortiz who ranks in the top 10.
 
Yes your right sorry....had it in my head they fury fights followed each other which they didn’t
So way wrong here. But still keeping the same argument you crafted around this made up nonsense.....

My argument has always been he is untested against the top 10 fighters (other than Ortiz)
This is also a factually false statement. He has been tested by a better higher ranked fighter twice. With a 3rd scheduled. Wrong again. You cant just remove a top 10 fighter from ones resume because YOU SAY SO... Then lie and pretend he didn't draw even the #1 ranked fighter. He has been tested by 2 top ten guys at the least. He also has been tested by somebody better than AJ has.
Can you find the post where I claimed fury won?
Here you go chief...vvvvvvvv
With fury he was gifted the draw he was dominated through that fight but got 2 knockdowns.
Lmao this is the same as saying Fury won the fight. You are playing games because your arguments don't hold up.
 
So way wrong here. But still keeping the same argument you crafted around this made up nonsense.....


This is also a factually false statement. He has been tested by a better higher ranked fighter twice. With a 3rd scheduled. Wrong again. You cant just remove a top 10 fighter from ones resume because YOU SAY SO... Then lie and pretend he didn't draw even the #1 ranked fighter. He has been tested by 2 top ten guys at the least. He also has been tested by somebody better than AJ has.

Here you go chief...vvvvvvvv

Lmao this is the same as saying Fury won the fight. You are playing games because your arguments don't hold up.
Mate really.....let me make this simple for you.....as I have said multiple times show me what top 10 fighters other than Ortiz he has beaten?

“He has been tested by a better higher ranked fighter twice. With a 3rd scheduled” yes he has been tested twice and failed those test’s your quiet right!
 
Mate really.....let me make this simple for you.....as I have said multiple times show me what top 10 fighters other than Ortiz he has beaten?

“He has been tested by a better higher ranked fighter twice. With a 3rd scheduled” yes he has been tested twice and failed those test’s your quiet right!

Top 10 is arguable

I think Dillian Whyte has beaten parker who was a solid 10 fighter, rivas might be another one, that's it, 1 at most 2 being generous

Wilder has 2 wins against Ortiz and 1 against stiverne. I would say Stiverne was almost definitely top 10, even Arreola might be top 10 and Molina has an outside chance of squeezing in a certain points of his career

Ring magazine have an annual rating which included
https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2013
Arreola at 7
Stiverne at 4

https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2014
Stiverne at 2
areola at 9

https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2015
stiverne at 6

https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2016
Stiverne at 7

https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2017
Breazeale at 9

So wilder could have as many as 6 top 10 wins
With Whyte at 1 by this metric

I would personally not consider breazeale a top 10 win and possibly include rivas, even though he is not on these lists, that would give Wilder 4 top 10 wins (I would not include his 2nd win against Stiverne), vs 2 for whyte(being generous)
 
Last edited:
Mate really.....let me make this simple for you.....as I have said multiple times show me what top 10 fighters other than Ortiz he has beaten?

“He has been tested by a better higher ranked fighter twice. With a 3rd scheduled” yes he has been tested twice and failed those test’s your quiet right!
Not what I said. All your points are based on semantics and word games. No substance.
He has 4 fights with a top ten opponent and 5th scheduled.
Why do you put validity on the top ten but then discredit a top ten fighter he murked twice? ??? That's a total biased joke.
 
Top 10 is arguable

I think Dillian Whyte has beaten parker who was a solid 10 fighter, rivas might be another one, that's it, 1 at most 2 being generous

Wilder has 2 wins against Ortiz and 1 against stiverne. I would say Stiverne was almost definitely top 10, even Arreola might be top 10 and Molina has an outside chance of squeezing in a certain points of his career

Ring magazine have an annual rating which included
https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2013
Arreola at 7
Stiverne at 4

https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2014
Stiverne at 2
areola at 9

https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2015
stiverne at 6

https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2016
Stiverne at 7

https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2017
Breazeale at 9

So wilder could have as many as 6 top 10 wins
With Whyte at 1 by this metric

I would personally not consider breazeale a top 10 win and possibly include rivas, even though he is not on these lists, that would give Wilder 4 top 10 wins (I would not include his 2nd win against Stiverne), vs 2 for whyte(being generous)
Now he will discredit and make excuses for all these official top 10 wins. Despite him coming up with the metric in the first place
 
Its NOT about Povetkin being an unknown fighter. Its about him not being on the level of Fury...
Povektin's resume is damn impressive.
Okey, let's not talk about 37-41 years old Povetkin, if Wilder had 32 years old Povetkin in the ring, most likely had been finished. The same if with prime versions of Klitschko brothers, again if in their prime.
Old aging fighters beatup consider as signature wins ( old version of Povetkin vs A.J, Wilder vs Ortiz etc alike ) are not signature wins at all.
+ don't pretend that my english is more horrible than your hypocrite attitude to non US fighters, you easily might type here that Wilder definitely was better than prime Lewis for example. Or if from US fighters, maybe better than Ali from 1959-1967 th, Foreman?
 
Not what I said. All your points are based on semantics and word games. No substance.
He has 4 fights with a top ten opponent and 5th scheduled.
Why do you put validity on the top ten but then discredit a top ten fighter he murked twice? ??? That's a total biased joke.
So you agree he is 2–1-1 out of those 4 not a great record is it
 
Top 10 is arguable

I think Dillian Whyte has beaten parker who was a solid 10 fighter, rivas might be another one, that's it, 1 at most 2 being generous

Wilder has 2 wins against Ortiz and 1 against stiverne. I would say Stiverne was almost definitely top 10, even Arreola might be top 10 and Molina has an outside chance of squeezing in a certain points of his career

Ring magazine have an annual rating which included
https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2013
Arreola at 7
Stiverne at 4

https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2014
Stiverne at 2
areola at 9

https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2015
stiverne at 6

https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2016
Stiverne at 7

https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2017
Breazeale at 9

So wilder could have as many as 6 top 10 wins
With Whyte at 1 by this metric

I would personally not consider breazeale a top 10 win and possibly include rivas, even though he is not on these lists, that would give Wilder 4 top 10 wins (I would not include his 2nd win against Stiverne), vs 2 for whyte(being generous)
I like your logic

some of those are only in the lists as they are very old without going through it I think it’s unlikely they was all top 10 when he fought them.

I agree with rankings it’s all subjective.

At the end of the day I am entitled to my opinion and I respect yours.

also for the record I am never said whyte should rank above wilder i said he should have been allowed to fight him and I think he could beat him.
 
Povektin's resume is damn impressive.
Okey, let's not talk about 37-41 years old Povetkin, if Wilder had 32 years old Povetkin in the ring, most likely had been finished. The same if with prime versions of Klitschko brothers, again if in their prime.
Old aging fighters beatup consider as signature wins ( old version of Povetkin vs A.J, Wilder vs Ortiz etc alike ) are not signature wins at all.
+ don't pretend that my english is more horrible than your hypocrite attitude to non US fighters, you easily might type here that Wilder definitely was better than prime Lewis for example. Or if from US fighters, maybe better than Ali from 1959-1967 th, Foreman?
Don’t worry about what @WklySportsMemes says about your English, it is very good for what I assume is a 2nd language. It’s just he won a spelling bee when he was 10 years old and now thinks is is intellectually superior to everyone else on here.
 
Povektin's resume is damn impressive.
Okey, let's not talk about 37-41 years old Povetkin, if Wilder had 32 years old Povetkin in the ring, most likely had been finished. The same if with prime versions of Klitschko brothers, again if in their prime.
Old aging fighters beatup consider as signature wins ( old version of Povetkin vs A.J, Wilder vs Ortiz etc alike ) are not signature wins at all.
+ don't pretend that my english is more horrible than your hypocrite attitude to non US fighters, you easily might type here that Wilder definitely was better than prime Lewis for example. Or if from US fighters, maybe better than Ali from 1959-1967 th, Foreman?
That has nothing to do with what we are talking about...But thanks
 
Don’t worry about what @WklySportsMemes says about your English, it is very good for what I assume is a 2nd language. It’s just he won a spelling bee when he was 10 years old and now thinks is is intellectually superior to everyone else on here.
He will never learn if you guys keep pampering him and lying to him.
 
I like your logic

some of those are only in the lists as they are very old without going through it I think it’s unlikely they was all top 10 when he fought them.

I agree with rankings it’s all subjective.

At the end of the day I am entitled to my opinion and I respect yours.

also for the record I am never said whyte should rank above wilder i said he should have been allowed to fight him and I think he could beat him.
He just litterally listed where they were ranked when he fought them which is a fact.....your opinion is simply denial at this point
 
Ok so a Draw is better than a win now right I got you
Here lets simplfy it.
I play Lebron James one on one.... We tie 3 games to 3.
I play a D1 College bench warmer Joe Blow....I win 4 games to 2
Which is the greater accomplishment ????? Which do I tell people about 1st?????
Let's not be dense..
 
Here lets simplfy it.
I play Lebron James one on one.... We tie 3 games to 3.
I play a D1 College bench warmer Joe Blow....I win 4 games to 2
Which is the greater accomplishment ????? Which do I tell people about 1st?????
Let's not be dense..
This is stupid....I can see clearly now.....1 draw against an out of shape former champion who most recent fights are against guys ranked out side the top 100 followed by a defeat in one of the most one sided beat downs ever of a world champion is definitely better than a victory over a recent champion.

you are also missing the point that wilder didn’t beat fury unlike in your stupid basketball analogy
 
This is stupid....I can see clearly now.....1 draw against an out of shape former champion who most recent fights are against guys ranked out side the top 100 followed by a defeat in one of the most one sided beat downs ever of a world champion is definitely better than a victory over a recent champion.

you are also missing the point that wilder didn’t beat fury unlike in your stupid basketball analogy
No the point is reality. In reality Fury was the lineal champ. And still better than Whyte or AJ or anybody they ever fought. Even after a layoff. He was not out of shape...that's another made up exaggerated narrative by you.
 
No the point is reality. In reality Fury was the lineal champ. And still better than Whyte or AJ or anybody they ever fought. Even after a layoff. He was not out of shape...that's another made up exaggerated narrative by you.

Fury is better than AJ, whyte and countless others because you say so right.

Even after the lay-off fury was not out of shape

5EA61473-53FC-4B23-9532-04BBFE77B7CF.jpeg

Stop embarrassing yourself
 
Back
Top