- Joined
- Sep 9, 2009
- Messages
- 6,762
- Reaction score
- 1
Your mom is gonna be mad when she sees those charges you made.
This is the same game you play when you pay for online porn isn't it?This streaming platform Dazn has charged me 3 separate times of 9.99 each after I cancelled my account. A total of 30$ due to no reason and when i ask customer service, they have no explanation why i was charged and each payment was unauthorized. WHat should I do from here now since dazn does not want to help? any suggestions
It’s unfortunate that this thread is still alive..
Damn, imagine being so poor a 30 dollar mistake causes outrage lmao
Even though this is the right forum it's the wrong forum. Change DAZN to fight pass and everyone on the first page mocking you would be angry right along with you even if Fight passs only overcharged you $5.
But I guess it's your own fault for signing up with a shitty service.
I'm calling it now, no matter how shitty DAZN gets, how much proof someone has they were ripped off, how little content they will provide at times etc. most of the WW forum won't give a shit and will attack anyone attacking the shitty DAZN streams for as long as that service lasts before it fails.
Is that even supposed to be a valid comparison?ESPN+ signed up 525,000 new subscribers for their first UFC card, DAZN did what for their first Bellator card again?
Lame non answer. Now do you have any idea of the comparisons of the numbers of new subscribers when each company debut on their new streaming services? ESPN released their numbers when the UFC debut, so what about DAZN when Bellator debut? It's actually a fair question and only a question.Is that even supposed to be a valid comparison?
Gimmick account gonna gimmick.
ESPN+ signed up 525,000 new subscribers for their first UFC card, DAZN did what for their first Bellator card again?
There’s no valid comparison, because they are two totally different situations. DAZN is brand new to the U.S, and picked up the organization that is a distant second, and had no built in network to market it. ESPN is already the giant of U.S. coverage, and picked up the #1 content provider in the sport, and already had the platform to advertise it on.Lame non answer. Now do you have any idea of the comparisons of the numbers of new subscribers when each company debut on their new streaming services? ESPN released their numbers when the UFC debut, so what about DAZN when Bellator debut? It's actually a fair question and only a question.
So I can see you on your "denial" trip. You provide no numbers, but plenty of excuses.There’s no valid comparison, because they are two totally different situations. DAZN is brand new to the U.S, and picked up the organization that is a distant second, and had no built in network to market it. ESPN is already the giant of U.S. coverage, and picked up the #1 content provider in the sport, and already had the platform to advertise it on.
But keep on finding ways to hate on Bellator, and Coker who cuckolded you.
This is such an antiquated way of resolving disputes with business. When was the last time this was effective? 1990? Right up there with getting petitions signed.Contact the Better Business Bureau
And your local House of Representatives
so yea i was not being seriousThis is such an antiquated way of resolving disputes with business. When was the last time this was effective? 1990? Right up there with getting petitions signed.