Someone passed out isn't a direct threat especially when in 3v1.
Well Putin is over 70 and a midget, im sure i can subdue him if needed.
wasn't passed out when he was threatening people. that's the whole point of subduing aggressive lunatics.
well tell yourself then that all these hobos are actually putin. it will go down easier.
completely irrelevant to the discussion concerning the value for society of what Penny did. which is unimpeachably good.
Nobody is saying it was wrong to try and subdue him.
Nobody is saying the subduing part was wrong, it was the choking him to death part that was the problem
And as i said before, i wouldn't need to choke Putin to subdue him.
Sure, but people tend to frown at the idea of killing undesirables after they have been neutralized.
was it really? not according to a jury of his peers.
you can fantasize about it.
"people" is a very generous term when actually talking about "some people".
The defense argued that Penny was afraid of Neely setting free and that's why he held the choke way past the time he went limp.
everybody that actually had fights in real life knows how these crackheads can act up.
they why all the contrarian endless replies. just leave the thread.
Penny came out looking pretty good out of it.
what if they die hitting their head from the fall?
Yup, which is why choking is always a very bad idea.
Buddy, it was a 3v1 and the hobbo was limp.
Sure, if they have a weapon, not if they are unconsciouss and subdued.
How is it contrarian? i am arguing exactly what Penny's defense argued, that Penny was scared and afraid and that's why he kept holding the choke even when other people told him the guy was out.
Yeah, he only had to go to trial and risk landing in prison.
The analogy would be if he died after you proceed to beat his unconscious as for a minute because you got scared.
Looked like a good idea actually.
So it worked.
Why risk it?
That's not what you're arguing. You're arguing that he shouldn't have done it.
Life is risky when you're a hero. No shit.
No, the analogy would be fuck around find out.
After Kenosha, they literally defended a child rapist after was shot by a kid who he ambushed while the latter was trying to put out a fire.
Considering he went to trial and he was in so much fear and distress that he felt the need to finish of the guy? i think not.
Anything works.
Risk what exactly? dude was unconsciouss.
Im arguing he shouldn't have killed the guy.
Ok
Which he did, im sure court isn't pleasant.
My lord, you can tell when someone can't keep up with the conversation. Remember the part about no evidence he was holding on for dear life (your accusation)? If he wasn't applying pressure, he could have held it indefinitely.
