So I finally got around to doing some research. I'm more of a "scientist" than "Dr." Eichner is. The guy has no peer reviewed publications from his PhD. Anyone that knows anything about the scientific community would know that peer reviewed publications measure the worth of a scientist. Myself I have one peer reviewed, first author publication in Dev Cell. I'm working on my 2nd now. Eichner has ZERO first/corresponding author papers in impact factor 5+ journals. A post-doc friend of mine makes a side income running an impact factor 2 journal in which people PAY HIM to have their papers published. He shops out the "peer reviews" to other PhDs and post-docs. Basically only first/corresponding author papers in impact factor 5-6+ journals actually matter in biological sciences. And even then, many bigger PIs won't even publish below impact factor 10. And his thesis supervisor didn't even put his name on his thesis. The guy was an orphan PhD student failure that was granted a mercy PhD. Many institutions will fail students, refusing to grant a PhD without first author, peer reviewed publications. Basically, Eichner has a Mc PhD, and is not a true scientist. Edit: This is the guy that runs the SMRTL facility and is the "expert" that Dana White keeps citing, who determined Jones "did not re-ingest" Turinabol. Dim also made a highly misinformed post here: He claimed that Eichner has over 20 lead (corresponding) author papers. He got this from simply glancing at the author lists from the papers. However, corresponding authors are not always listed last. Upon furhter review only 1 publication had Eichner as the corresponding author, and it was in a trash tier impact factor 2.5 journal. For someone that gives everyone else shit, let's see if Dim can apologize for making his own uninformed post.