Wand is still a big name and still owns wins over somewhat relevant UFC MWs in Cung Le and Bisping. I doubt DFW will cut him that easily especially on the heels of Bellator's 100+k ppv buys.
Wandy would still have to get a license in those promotions. If Nevada denies him of his license or there is some controversy floating around, no other state is going to license him either. He has to get this sorted out with Nevada period or his fight career is over.
Ok Senszo, if we assume he wont be able to get licensed and go to bellator, their are still other competing organizations not based in the US. And whether you like it or not, hes a huge draw and their are big fights to be made with Wand in other organizations.
Its not smart from a business perspective to cut wand. It would be smarter to slowly feed him fights until hes 40 and retires.
Chael loses against Rashad and receives a title shot. Where does he explain the logic with this?
Belfort via KO
Not true. Fighters are denied a license in one jurisdiction but allowed to fight elsewhere all the time. For example, after Barnett failed a drug test and couldn't get licensed in California (scuttling his planned bout with Fedor), he was able to get licensed in Texas and Ohio before later clearing his issues up with California.
What is weird is Dana seems to be implying that Wand's UFC career is contingent on being able to be licensed by the NSAC. They run shows in Brazil all the time. Why does it matter whether the NSAC licenses him or not?
Miscommunication, but Wanderlei should have been cut.