- Joined
- Jan 25, 2009
- Messages
- 25,472
- Reaction score
- 13,732
Yeah well a little virtue signalling is the strict minimum nowadays I suppose. But at least the UFC is not into censorship and ruining careers and lynching people publicly.
But that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.King Mo: cut from Zuffa-owned StrikeForce for going off on a commissioner.
John Cholish: cut for saying he lost money by fighting in Brazil.
Cris Cyborg: released for criticizing Dana
American Kickboxing Academy: nearly cancelled for speaking out against the video game likeness deal.
You could do this all day but they're just going to keep reaching.King Mo: cut from Zuffa-owned StrikeForce for going off on a commissioner.
John Cholish: cut for saying he lost money by fighting in Brazil.
Cris Cyborg: released for criticizing Dana
American Kickboxing Academy: nearly cancelled for speaking out against the video game likeness deal.
But that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
OP said Dana is anti-cancel and pro free speech and I’m posting examples to the contrary
Oh shut up pussy. I just don't like the cult of personality the pink goof has, and his obvious sycophant plants that he has throwing him these softball questions to manicure his image. Dana's cut plenty of fighters for what they say outside of the UFC, with examples in this thread. Go hop on his dick if what I said made you so upset.
Colby does it everyday.Criticize China and see what happens.
No, your counter examples do not fit at all. Firing someone over statement pertaining to business is vastly different to firing someone over political correctness or political views.
I do not think that this fall under free speech. Corporations are not democracies.Doesn’t that fall under free speech? Dana said fighters can say whatever they want without consequence but that’s obviously not the case
No, your counter examples do not fit at all. Firing someone over statement pertaining to business is vastly different to firing someone over political correctness or political views.
I'm not upset at what you said, it just amazes me at how disingenuous you sjws are.
You said the political discourse of the fighters and dana are only being discussed in karate forums, as your disingenuous way of shutting down this conversation.
You essentially said, no one cares or talks about what the ufc and the fighters say about politics.
Meanwhile, in reality, everytime a fighter or dana says something political, it becomes a trending topic on twitter, which leads to the main stream media writing articles about how offensive the ufc and their fighters are and how they shouldn't be allowed to say certain things
I don't have a strong view on this but not sure why you are so vested and agitated.You're changing your narrative which shows how wrong you actually are.
You've gone from a 'free speech' viewpoint to a 'political correctness' viewpoint.
Pretty laughable
I don't have a strong view on this but not sure why you are so vested and agitated.
I'm not upset at what you said, it just amazes me at how disingenuous you sjws are.
You said the political discourse of the fighters and dana are only being discussed in karate forums, as your disingenuous way of shutting down this conversation.
You essentially said, no one cares or talks about what the ufc and the fighters say about politics.
Meanwhile, in reality, everytime a fighter or dana says something political, it becomes a trending topic on twitter, which leads to the main stream media writing articles about how offensive the ufc and their fighters are and how they shouldn't be allowed to say certain things