I like conor but he has retarded fans
How is this making any sense? Chad faced a wrestler? So? He is freaking wrestler himself
Conor didn't fight wrestlers and he is a striker while Chad didn't fought elite strikers and he is a wrestler. So Chad was also given favorable match ups. In fact when did he beat elite striker before he got another title shot against the best striker in division? Elkins, Guida, Lentz?
Come on. UFC is pushing Conor but its not like they gave Chad any big bumps on his way to a title shot.
Better wrestler.
Swanson was winning over strikers easy. What happened when he faced a wrestler? How do you know it won't be the same for Conor?
How is this making any sense? Chad faced a wrestler? So? He is freaking wrestler himself
Conor didn't fight wrestlers and he is a striker while Chad didn't fought elite strikers and he is a wrestler. So Chad was also given favorable match ups. In fact when did he beat elite striker before he got another title shot against the best striker in division? Elkins, Guida, Lentz? Or elite strikers like Meza or Cody? Give me a break.
Yes, UFC is pushing Conor but its not like they gave Chad any big bumps on his way to a title shot.
So now better wrestler equals better fighter? Must have missed that memo.
Mcgregor has not had any similar issues during his ufc stint.
You said in what way is Lentz better than Poirier? I said in wrestling. How did you get he's a better fighter than that? But to answer your question, he probably is. They're both ranked right next to each other and I think Lentz has the skills to beat Poirier. But all that aside, he's better than Poirier in the one thing that the UFC is keeping Conor away from.So now better wrestler equals better fighter? Must have missed that memo.
How many fights do you honestly watch? What was "easy" about swansons wins over poirier or siver?
We already saw swanson get decimated via grappling multiple times prior to his fight vs edgar, and even in his fight vs siver he showed a vulnerability. Mcgregor has not had any similar issues during his ufc stint.
Styles make fights...
That's because he hasn't fought any legit wrestlers...
Are you new to MMA?
You said in what way is Lentz better than Poirier? I said in wrestling. How did you get he's a better fighter than that? But to answer your question, he probably is. They're both ranked right next to each other and I think Lentz has the skills to beat Poirier. But all that aside, he's better than Poirier in the one thing that the UFC is keeping Conor away from.
As for your second point, we haven't seen him have similar issues because he hasn't faced ranked guys. That's the point of people saying Conor hasn't been tested.
How about we go PRE-UFC 178 in July.
http://www.fightline.com/conor-mcgregor-calls-dustin-poirier-nik-lentz/
Oh, I forgot, siver is a legit wrestler :icon_lol:
I bet none of conor's opponents ever even practiced a single or double leg takedown either.
Well Mendes was also undefeated other than Aldo and had already beaten Cub Swanson, Eric Koch, Javier Vasquez, Omigawa and Rani Yahya and there arent any other top strikers in the top 10. (edgar, Lamas, Bermudez, Poirer) Mcgregor some how managed to dodge him all and get basically the only tailor made fights available in the division.
All style matchups that favored him. I'll give him credit. He's definitely good but the way the UFC is protecting him and rushing him to the top is sickening. Is it wrong to want to see a little bit of fairness? At least give him somebody who could actually shut up the people like me who say that he hasn't been tested vs a wrestler. I have no interest in seeing someone potentially win the belt who will most likely lose it the first time they fight someone that could expose their weakness.
The UFC has no longterm vision. It's all about right now and that's why their company is going to the shitter.