Dan Hooker offered Islam the fight for 263, which was last night. He refused.No. Islam vs Hooker or Tony vs Hooker.
He offered Islam a fight (for 263) but he refused.He seems like a good guy in interviews but it's annoying that he always wants to fight up in the ranks (or higher profile fights, Chandler was a unique situation) no matter if he's losing multiple fights back to back. He should be fighting down in the rankings vs someone like Makhachev, Gillespie or Tsarukyan at this point.
No. Islam vs Hooker or Tony vs Hooker.
You dont "duck" contenders when you're 0-2 in your last two fights man.... he needs a tune up and Nate is no gimme
He offered Islam a fight (for 263) but he refused.
Why should Hooker have to cater to Islam's schedule? The world doesn't revolve around him. Where's the whole "send me location," attitude these Dagestani fighters speak of? Also, you have a champion in Usman who is defending his title two months after his previous defence, if Islam really wanted it, he could have fought. No wonder Khamzat parted ways with the Dagestani fighters.That's an empty offer just like Adesanya offering Whittaker to fight 2 months after a full fight camp. Ramadan just ended in mid-May, Hooker knew Makhachev couldn't have fought that soon.
Why should Hooker have to cater to Islam's schedule? The world doesn't revolve around him. Where's the whole "send me location," attitude these Dagestani fighters speak of? Also, you have a champion in Usman who is defending his title two months after his previous defence, if Islam really wanted it, he could have fought. No wonder Khamzat parted ways with the Dagestani fighters.
True, but I just don't think Hooker deserved to be called a duck.At the end of the day it's a weak move to offer to fight any opponent when you clearly know their training camp would be compromised, that all there is to it.
ffs, how stupid is this forum today
WW? hes a LW. He used to fight at FW ffs.
Man just fought and lost two Chandler and Poirier. Hooker probably just looking for a tune-up