Dan Hardy's commentary tonight during Usman/Hughes was among the most terrible and biased I've ever heard

MarioLemieux

Banned
Banned
Joined
Sep 8, 2024
Messages
1,083
Reaction score
2,886
This guy belongs nowhere near a commentator booth he was letting it all hang out with his bias.

I mean it was a close fight but you would think Hughes dominated Usman listening to him. It was so bad I had to shut it off just to get an accurate feel for the fight.

*Usman lands 12 kicks in a row* crickets Hughes lands a body shot to a crazy over-reaction.
 
It was nowhere near as bad as the UFC boys constantly hyping up their FP prelim guys as being the next best thing.
 
He was selling it on hughes but at the same time not every leg kick usman threw was worth a damn. 5 rounds and bro wasn't even limping and it didn't affect his TDD, so how much weighting do you give strikes that did fuck all?
 
GOAT commentator
RGJ5.gif
 
Dan is one of the best technical analyzers, im surprised by the responses, lol.
 
you should be more concerned with the judges who were clearly biased towards Nurmagomedov
 
Dan is one of the best technical analyzers, im surprised by the responses, lol.

He's not bad, he used to irritate me by drawing all over the screen in the middle of the fight but he seems to have cut back on that.
 
Dan is one of the best technical analyzers, im surprised by the responses, lol.
He's probably the most biased commentator you could find, it even leaked into his Analysis sometimes like the Woodley/Till video. You'd have thought Tyron was a dead man walking with how Dan sold Darren for that one.
 
Brits are extremely biased people in general when it comes to another Anglo.
 
Surprised he wasn't hyping up On the Road by Jack Kerouac, as he looks like he was influenced by it.
 
Back
Top