- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 92,559
- Reaction score
- 28,337
I also don’t think these stats are good at all for comparing players who played in different eras. The Babe is on the top of war rankings (varies depending on different calculations but always top 3, I think) and I’m convinced in today’s game he’s similar to David Ortiz. But DO played against much better competition so Babe comes up much higher.
Jeter being a spot higher than Trout doesn’t sit well either.
(I’m still working this shit out and talking a bit out of my ass)
Didn't see this part. Remember that Trout has played a LOT less than Jeter. By fWAR, Jeter's best single-season total was 7.4. Trout's totals in all of his seasons have been: 10.1, 10.2, 8.3, 9.3, 9.7, 6.8 (only 114 games), 9.8, and 8.6. Going by WAR, Trout has been much, much better than Jeter, but he's only played 1,199 games, while Jeter played 2,747 games. Nate Silver joked that Trout should be called "Ares" (god of WAR).
Also, there's no era adjustment. It's how many wins you added in the time you played. You can mentally adjust for improved caliber of play over the years, but I think the adjustment would be smaller than people appreciate.
Last edited: