- Joined
- Aug 27, 2016
- Messages
- 1,999
- Reaction score
- 1,177
A study into the effect of the protests looked at 315 cities across the US between May 15 and June 20, and using 'Safegraph' (an anonymised population movement dataset of 45m smartphone devices), found that social distancing increased in the overall population of the counties that had cities with large protests, in comparison to control counties that did not (contrary to the general decline in distancing). More people were staying at home in those counties during the protests, and until about a week after when the social distancing started to decline. The significance of this -they contend, is that the decrease in social distancing by the protesters is more than offset by the overall increase in social distancing by the wider population choosing to stay at home and avoid public places during the protests.
Furthermore, they found no significant divergence in covid case growth between protest and non-protest cities for the 3+ weeks following the onset of the protests (they were almost the same prior), concluding that whilst possible that there was covid spread amongst the protesters, this had little effect on the entire population in the protest counties for the sample period.
Furthermore, they found no significant divergence in covid case growth between protest and non-protest cities for the 3+ weeks following the onset of the protests (they were almost the same prior), concluding that whilst possible that there was covid spread amongst the protesters, this had little effect on the entire population in the protest counties for the sample period.
Last edited: