- Joined
- Oct 29, 2009
- Messages
- 35,442
- Reaction score
- 2,100
So Bellator fighters are paid more?
No, they arent.
20% of a lot is better than 45% of fuck all
Some might disagree with you.
So Bellator fighters are paid more?
No, they arent.
20% of a lot is better than 45% of fuck all
what?
that 20% of a shit load of revenue is more than 45% of fuck all revenue?
people actually think that 45% is better than 20% in this situation?
we have this thread every week, and every week a bunch of sherdoggers that clearly have not even a basic understanding of finance get all het up and excited.
But here the labour is actually the product.my labour costs in the last company I worked for were about 15%. Company before that (international company) around 7-9%
It won’t happen because the fighters with the most clout are paid well and have no interest in a union. If the majority banded together it could well happen.War bellator. Talk of a union is utter nonsense and anyone who thinks with any form of clarity can see in practice it could and would never happen.
The Ali act being extended to MMA(or something similar) is the only hope for fighters to get paid more and have more flexibility.
You guys paid for it? Bro I've been a shill for the UFC for years on sherdog. Dana has sent me 6 branders. I keep texting him I want some gloves be he ignores me.See I told you guys that buying the UFC hot dog brander wouldn't lead to a wage increase for fighters, but you never listened to me, you all brought it and were stubborn.
I want to make a complaint, tell daddy Dana that I am unhappy with the quality of the hot dog brander. I can't make out the UFC letters as I had hoped for on my dogs.You guys paid for it? Bro I've been a shill for the UFC for years on sherdog. Dana has sent me 6 branders. I keep texting him I want some gloves be he ignores me.
what?
that 20% of a shit load of revenue is more than 45% of fuck all revenue?
people actually think that 45% is better than 20% in this situation?
we have this thread every week, and every week a bunch of sherdoggers that clearly have not even a basic understanding of finance get all het up and excited.
Exactly. I can’t even imagine how much someone like Conor fighting skews those numbers and it’s still below 30% total.That the UFC paid about the same percent of revenue to the fighters as other sports did their athletes. And mind you, that approx 20% apparently includes every single thing given to the fighters, not just show/win cash, but all bonuses and discretionary pay, including the famous backroom bonuses everyone images is huge. Meaning the PPV and extra given to the lucky few the UFC actually promotes eats a big chunk.
No no, you have confused my giant Murican' brain with your rage-filled commietardation.Nope I’m actually not. English is my 4th language. I know that might be hard for your cheeseburger and hot dog brain to understand. But don’t worry, I’ll speak only English to you. Wouldn’t wanna confuse your pea sized brain any further.
A, there is no "fair." If you think there is for such an esoteric sport, you need to rethink the core concepts of capitalism. There is no "fair" on either side; its only unfair once government gets heavy-handedly involved.The point is that the fighters contribute equally to the gross revenue in both organizations, and one gives their fighters over twice the percentage.
Obviously the UFC does more for the fighter than Bellator, in terms of opportunity. But it's still acting as a monopoly. And 19% is still a good 10 percent below fair.
Thanks random guy for telling a company you didn't built how to run itself!If bellator can afford 45% and stay afloat then there’s no reason the ufc can’t. No excuse for this.
Great point, also just because they are paying that doesn't mean they can afford to - plenty of companies run in the red in an effort to develop to the point they are profitable and can then pay back investments.Thanks random guy for telling a company you didn't built how to run itself!
There is an excuse: Bellator is likely not making Viacom very much money. Bellator pays quite poorly, actually. Their attraction to fighters is advertising. The reason the percentage is higher is because of how little Bellator earns. Math friend, if you lower the denominator, you raise the product of the equation.
I didn't buy it for the fighters I bought it so my hotdogs can beat up your hotdogs.See I told you guys that buying the UFC hot dog brander wouldn't lead to a wage increase for fighters, but you never listened to me, you all brought it and were stubborn.
Or kill the sportWar bellator. Talk of a union is utter nonsense and anyone who thinks with any form of clarity can see in practice it could and would never happen.
The Ali act being extended to MMA(or something similar) is the only hope for fighters to get paid more and have more flexibility.