- Joined
- Nov 17, 2016
- Messages
- 9,921
- Reaction score
- 11,996
“The fighters sign the contract durrrrrrrr”The fighters sign the contracts. This is a different discussion if the fighters were better represented as a whole.
“The fighters sign the contract durrrrrrrr”The fighters sign the contracts. This is a different discussion if the fighters were better represented as a whole.
Well ya, that was what I was getting at. I haven't found any Lorenzo quotes saying what @KeepItRealist says he said. But I'm still looking.
Regardless of how it all washes out, props to Cung Le for pushing it this far.
So you think that 45% of Bellators revenue is more than 20% of the UFC's revenue?
And you are calling other people stupid.
That's the point of this. There are multiple ways to get collective bargaining. One way is for fighters to boycott / work stoppage. Another way is federal oversight. Another way is via the courts.The fighters sign the contracts. This is a different discussion if the fighters were better represented as a whole.
Thank you sir. Including the explanation of (most likely) why I couldn't find it.https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2016/dec/01/ufc-fighters-union-wme-img-better-treatment
That references the claim Lorenzo was making for a decade. MMA isn't front page sports news, it's not easy to find coverage of his claims from years ago, The Guardian isn't a source I'd like to use, but he's claimed or at least implied the UFC paid around 50% as the major sports pay their athletes many times when he's seldom been asked. The original ESPN interview isn't even cached anymore.
“The fighters sign the contract durrrrrrrr”
Thank you sir. Including the explanation of (most likely) why I couldn't find it.
See I told you guys that buying the UFC hot dog brander wouldn't lead to a wage increase for fighters, but you never listened to me, you all brought it and were stubborn.
If bellator can afford 45% and stay afloat then there’s no reason the ufc can’t. No excuse for this.what?
that 20% of a shit load of revenue is more than 45% of fuck all revenue?
people actually think that 45% is better than 20% in this situation?
we have this thread every week, and every week a bunch of sherdoggers that clearly have not even a basic understanding of finance get all het up and excited.
Bingo20% of a watermelon is still better than 40% of a grape
The other 80% is being well spent..
If bellator can afford 45% and stay afloat then there’s no reason the ufc can’t. No excuse for this.
That's not a lie though. Even at 20% their lowest paid fighter gets more than the lowest paid guy in any other company. Same with the highest. If you see the average, that would probably also be higher for the UFC.What were his claims?
EDIT: maybe you're referring to this?
"We pay way more than anybody else in the space, that's a factor. You do have some fighters that maybe aren't happy with what they get, but at the end of the day, the fighters that achieve great things in this sport and get to the level of actually making a career of it, you don't see many of those athletes complaining. That's the fact of the matter."
"The guys who are rising to the top are making the majority of the money."