- Joined
- Jan 2, 2011
- Messages
- 7,629
- Reaction score
- 11,861
The questionable science is really starting to piss me off. The paper references a hamster study where they infected the critters with a high, low, or placebo dose and then checked them daily for various symptoms & effects. When I went through that paper, it turns out that the high dose was about 400 times bigger than the low dose, and yes, it did result in measurable differences in symptom severity.
Problem: an N95 or equivalent is the only one that'll get that level of reduction, regular surgical or cloth masks aren't anywhere close and will only reduce the viral load by about 6 times. No one has done a study to see if that's enough of a reduction to have a measurable effect on the symptoms, but it's just assumed that it should work.
This is not the first time I've seen shoddy incomplete "science".
https://forums.sherdog.com/posts/161064002/
This is how you give scientists a bad name and fuck up public policy.
These types of articles just keeps getting churned out by the truck-load, and 9 times out of 10, the article skews in a direction that promotes obvious interests/narratives. Unfortunately, so many just swallow it up and regurgitate with a sloppy copy/paste of an article (e.g. the post you responded to). We are literally witnessing the weaponization of science, and these posters spamming these yahoo "studies" are like the front line fodder... Whats sad, is that the folks posting these false narratives often have no idea the harm they are doing (they probably think they are helping).