- Joined
- Oct 24, 2009
- Messages
- 1,028
- Reaction score
- 0
Jon Jones was taken down by Gustafsson, "a kickboxer".
I guess that means Jones is not a top MMA wrestler huh.
That doesn't count, because it's Jones.
Jon Jones was taken down by Gustafsson, "a kickboxer".
I guess that means Jones is not a top MMA wrestler huh.
Being an elite wrestler does not mean that you can't be taken down by an inferior wrestler (even Cain was taken down by Kongo).Jon Jones was taken down by Gustafsson, "a kickboxer".
I guess that means Jones is not a top MMA wrestler huh.
Being an elite wrestler does not mean that you can't be taken down by an inferior wrestler (even Cain was taken down by Kongo).
But Barnett was not merely taken down by Crocop by surprise. He was dominated by him positionally on the ground for a considerable period of time, in two fights, and he couldn't get up in either of those fights.
Gustafsson, on the other hand, could not even completely secure the takedown against Jones. Jon got up right away.
Apples and oranges.
You know, it is really frustrating to argue with someone who ignores most of the things I say, constantly jumps from one point to another, and repeats the things I have already addressed.Putting aside the nonsense of holding a few losses to prime Crocop against Barnett aside for a moment:
I already answered that in this thread.Do you think DC is an elite wrestler?
Being an elite wrestler does not mean that you can't be taken down by an inferior wrestler
Apples and oranges.
guy makes a lot of interesting points but some retards just blatantly ignores it
amazing
Not they wouldn't be. Especially not Hamill. He has 91% takedown defense on fightmetric and I don't recall anyone taking him down besides Jon Jones. He took Tito down at will. Hamill is a much better MMA wrestler than Barnett, Henderson and Monson (at the time Cormier faced him).
Why isn't it apples and oranges when you were making the same type of argument to discredit Hendo, etc. Fact is no one has rag dolled Hendo like that before. He may have been taken down but if you can't see the difference in what DC did, then there's no point in even discussing it.
Second, Hamill is no where near the wrestler Hendo is, and the janitor was waaay past his prime when JJ fought him. And as far as Barnatt goes, you're also ignoring the size disadvantage DC had, and he still tooled him.
You had to go back 12 years to argue your point, citing a fight you have obviously never even watched.Barnett is a world class MMA wrestler, ask Randy Couture.
You know, it is really frustrating to argue with someone who ignores most of the things I say, constantly jumps from one point to another, and repeats the things I have already addressed.
I already answered that in this thread.
I am not. Henderson has been repeatedly outwrestled by non-wrestlers. Jones was momentarily taken down by a non-wrestler once, and it was the only time he was taken down in his entire career.Why isn't it apples and oranges when you were making the same type of argument to discredit Hendo, etc.
But I am not arguing against that point. I am arguing that Cormier has not fought elite wrestlers in MMA yet, and that Jones is a much more proven MMA wrestler. Do you disagree with either of those claims?Fact is no one has rag dolled Hendo like that before. He may have been taken down but if you can't see the difference in what DC did, then there's no point in even discussing it.
See my earlier post.Second, Hamill is no where near the wrestler Hendo is