- Joined
- Aug 23, 2016
- Messages
- 688
- Reaction score
- 397
More money in the private sector usually. Liberals are more driven by their beliefs than money in general. Not about being strong or weak. A liberal is cool just teaching rather than taking a risk and doing
Meh, driven by money and not wanting to affect real change or at least viewpoints, which lead to real change, while the "others" or liberals are out to do so sounds weak to me, selfish at best, and some what silly in either case when they don't make that choice but then bitch about the situation......
And if non-liberals are taking "risks" and doing, why are they still so behind? Are Americans so silly as to follow these people you present as "just teaching" over those doing?
If that were a math test you would have gotten in wrong. The left pursing an information monopoly (with which they spread false propaganda) does not equate to strength for them and weakness for their political opponents.
In order to get this point you are presenting, do you mean it does not make them stronger in that they are seeking the control or that they have this at least perceived control?
As someone pointed out in this thread, if they pursue control enough, and get it as some here are noting, even based on "false propaganda," what ever this means, will it not lead to increased power?
You remind me of Ben Shapiro, all these points you bring up every time, mathematically even, but as one tracked as idiot leftists are, you sound like you are used to discussing events in an echo chamber as well and a bit out of touch with whats really happening as well. Discussing Social Science as a Science will not lead to anything, especially power.
Last edited: