That's the easy stuff.
I just said it as an example and then clarified my actual routine afterwards which would be 10% of my baseline every week. I've done poor ketosis diets before where I crashed when I cut too quickly and would lose quite a bit of mass and couldn't stick with it. It could work with 20 if you stick with it. I mean it could be -1 carb a day if you wanted as long as you stuck with it until you hit your goal. It's not a sprint, and dialing in exactly what your body needs to achieve your goals can take months. It's not a sprint, it's a marathon.
.
You didn't have to TLDR. I read a lot of research articles on PubMed in my spare time. I have taken nutrition courses, exercise physiology, human physiology, etc., so the above list isn't very long and I read it all
Ok, so most dietitian are not trained specifically for nutrition for athletic performance, unless they get specialized training. And please correct me if I'm wrong, but sport nutrition isn't very complex if we're just talking about food, caloric intakes, vitamins and minerals, which are what most dieticians deal with in sport nutrition.
High caloric intake to gain mass (both fat and muscle).
High carbs and carbs loading for endurance events.
High protein, low carbs to lose fat.
Potassium and calcium for muscle contraction.
etc., etc.
So, my point is that for athletic enhancement purposes, a sport dieticians with biochemistry and other complex course works and years of clinical work in hospitals and clinics dealing with sick and regular people are not more qualified than a sport "nutritionists" who have working experience with real athletes and know what works and what doesn't work to improve performance.
But we are still learning about our physiology. It may be "as simple as" at the moment simply because the research is limited or has not been done yet. It's constantly evolving.
Bravo, well done. And they say those things about a UFC champion lol.
Seeing they are watching your ass, I am serious. Unless your a commie. Commie.
Depends on where you study. You don't just do clinic hours during your masters. You have rightly pointed out a flaw in the system that I have a gripe with too. Other topics have options in their masters degrees (research, coursework etc). I think you should have three options: sports, clinic, or research. The end game would still be a dietitian but you could be more specific instead of a jack of all trades. They'd have similar components, but tailored differences.You didn't have to TLDR. I read a lot of research articles on PubMed in my spare time. I have taken nutrition courses, exercise physiology, human physiology, etc., so the above list isn't very long and I read it all
Ok, so most dietitian are not trained specifically for nutrition for athletic performance, unless they get specialized training. And please correct me if I'm wrong, but sport nutrition isn't very complex if we're just talking about food, caloric intakes, vitamins and minerals, which are what most dieticians deal with in sport nutrition.
High caloric intake to gain mass (both fat and muscle).
High carbs and carbs loading for endurance events.
High protein, low carbs to lose fat.
Potassium and calcium for muscle contraction.
etc., etc.
So, my point is that for athletic enhancement purposes, a sport dieticians with biochemistry and other complex course works and years of clinical work in hospitals and clinics dealing with sick and regular people are not more qualified than a sport "nutritionists" who have working experience with real athletes and know what works and what doesn't work to improve performance.
