- Joined
- Jun 3, 2008
- Messages
- 3,743
- Reaction score
- 23
I've been watching this sport for 10 years, seen a lot of robberies, this fight was far from one.
Conor landed more significant strikes, had more output, knocked Nate down several times, did way more damage, for Pete's sake look at Nate's face..
The only reason people are calling this a robbery is because they want to continue their fantasy that Conor's legacy ended after getting choked out in the first fight, but fuck off and give Conor his credit. He could've went down to fight at 145 after that lost, instead he came back and asked for this and defeated Nate being under tremendous pressure knowing that losing twice in a row would hurt his career badly and may even have ruined it. Don't hate, judge fights objectively.
Conor landed more significant strikes, had more output, knocked Nate down several times, did way more damage, for Pete's sake look at Nate's face..
The only reason people are calling this a robbery is because they want to continue their fantasy that Conor's legacy ended after getting choked out in the first fight, but fuck off and give Conor his credit. He could've went down to fight at 145 after that lost, instead he came back and asked for this and defeated Nate being under tremendous pressure knowing that losing twice in a row would hurt his career badly and may even have ruined it. Don't hate, judge fights objectively.
