Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by Deleted member 502383, Aug 13, 2018.
Conor McGregor 62.5%
Khabib Nurmagomedov 45%
Stats don't lie.
But they can be taken out of context. Much harder taking down wrestlers than taking Max down.
Anderson Silva has a higher takedown accuracy than Daniel Cormier
That’s it then. 26-1
TD success literally means nothing unless you include volume of TDs and attempt to control for fighter quality, fighter TD defense, etc...
I could take down my grandmother (if she hasn't been training) 1 time out of 1 while DC takes down Lesnar 20 times out of 30 and end up with a 100% success rate vs. his 67% rate...but who would be the better TD artist?
Not to mention Khabib frequent chains takedowns together in the first place.
Khabib has 45% takedown accuracy?
Is that actually true?
Because that's kinda low ain't it?
I'd expect someone of his reputation to be like 90%
Conor - 87%
Khabib - 100%
I'll take your grandma down..
Khabib's notable wins:
Rafael Dos Anjos
Conor's notable wins:
Only, Khabib is bigger and stronger, better wrestler and will have a full training camp...
There was 1 more takedown there
Conor stuffed 4 others though.
Conor also stuffed Mendes from having a training camp
Conor won't have a blown out knee, will actually have time to train/gameplan for an elite grappler and Khabib won't be juiced to the gills like Mendes.
To be fair to Khabib,Barboza is a good win too.
How does McGregor's cum taste?
Probably no different to your dad's
Oh I guess that means conors the better grappler then. Try using your eyeballs, TS.
I rate the Al win just ahead of the Barboza win. Even if Al gave Khabib a little too much respect.
I didn't say that I just shared some stats I cane across, no need for frustration.
Why? I think Barboza is a better fighter.
Separate names with a comma.