- Joined
- Apr 19, 2013
- Messages
- 23,987
- Reaction score
- 11,182
Being a warrior need not entail loving war, nor entail being hawkish with regard to military action.
1 1/2 minute video.
1 1/2 minute video.
Last edited:
she took a huge risk putting her neck out for Bernie. Especially as a young Congresswoman working in Clinton territory knowing she may see 8 years of Hillary's rule. The Clintons wont forget this betrayal.
she took a huge risk putting her neck out for Bernie. Especially as a young Congresswoman working in Clinton territory knowing she may see 8 years of Hillary's rule. The Clintons wont forget this betrayal.
I don't think she did. She has my unconditional support for any office moving forward, and I doubt I am the only one.
She torched herself with the establishment DNC, but those people are on a ticking time clock. The schism we are seeing on Republican side, is coming to the Democrat's side as well. It is just a matter of time.
In fact, my support of Trump, is evidence that this schism is already occurring.
I think you are grossly and absurdly exaggerating how the clintons will respond to an an endorsement of a primary rival. The clintons are political animals first, and blatant retaliation to a member of their political base over something like this would just serve to weaken that. The primary motivating factor is power, not pettiness.she took a huge risk putting her neck out for Bernie. Especially as a young Congresswoman working in Clinton territory knowing she may see 8 years of Hillary's rule. The Clintons wont forget this betrayal.
I think you are grossly and absurdly exaggerating how the clintons will respond to an an endorsement of a primary rival. The clintons are political animals first, and blatant retaliation to a member of their political base over something like this would just serve to weaken that. The primary motivating factor is power, not pettiness.
Yes, because she's abandoning an influential position. Warned =/= threatened.Gabbard herself said she was warned by many in the DNC and congress that she'd pay a price for endorsing Sanders if Hillary went on to win. Even if you believe that the Clintons wouldn't be like that, apparently many in the DNC and congress do expect that sort of "pettiness" of them.
Gabbard 'warned' about leaving DNC to endorse Sanders
By Eric DuVall | March 2, 2016 | UPI
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2016...leaving-DNC-to-endorse-Sanders/9861456937372/
she took a huge risk putting her neck out for Bernie. Especially as a young Congresswoman working in Clinton territory knowing she may see 8 years of Hillary's rule. The Clintons wont forget this betrayal.
yeah thats a crack pot theory, especially considering she would be in line behind warrenThe Hillary crazies say that she is only supporting Bernie to undermine Hillary run for President and that she wants to be the first woman president even if it means an Donald Trump Presidency. Not my words just some crazies on Hillary side.
The problem is Warren would be over 70 years old in 4 years. Tulsi is I think 36 years old. People now say she is gunning to be Bernie's running mate.yeah thats a crack pot theory, especially considering she would be in line behind warren
If Warren wants to be POTUS. I'd rather her Secretsry of Treasury, Secreatsry of Commerse, or SEC Chair under a POTUS like Sanders who shared her views. Dat tag team would be potent. I say that even though I would vote for her to be potus because she is so tst in those areas.yeah thats a crack pot theory, especially considering she would be in line behind warren
Even with all your immense political power at her disposal, it was a huge risk.
I think you are grossly and absurdly exaggerating how the clintons will respond to an an endorsement of a primary rival. The clintons are political animals first, and blatant retaliation to a member of their political base over something like this would just serve to weaken that. The primary motivating factor is power, not pettiness.