- Joined
- Oct 17, 2015
- Messages
- 21,165
- Reaction score
- 4,676
nm
I can’t believe it’s reality.I'm more concerned with the fact that more and more school districts across the nation are nowprohibitingdiscouraging teachers from giving any student a zero for no work done.
Under the new grading policy, any homework that did not get turned in must get a score of 50%, or the teacher might get fired.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.orlandosentinel.com/opinion/os-ae-florida-teacher-fired-for-giving-zeros-david-whitley-20180925-story.html?outputType=amp
I don't get how some kids are "underprivileged", though? In what sense???
Don't they ALL receive the same amount of tuition, homework, etc.??? Don't they all read off the same textbooks???
What am I missing here?
I hope this is a jokeIn that national math and reading k-12 test score thread the other day, someone pointed out that African Americans only scored 3 points better on math than mentally handicapped students. I had no idea the numbers were that bad. Banning the SAT isn't the solution but that's a problem that really needs to be addressed.
It's not that hard to believe (and unfortunately it's true). The average African American IQ is 85. But if you look at white Americans just 100 years ago based on WW 1 IQ tests of GIs, the average white American then would have an IQ of 80 today. So it's not a genetic thing. It's a cultural thing. African Americans are roughly, culturally speaking, where white Americans were 100 years ago. Like 5 generations of development behind.I hope this is a joke
I actually blame them less than the naive and patronizing idiot white progressives.The SATs had a good run guys, but black people are now offended.
And they have support from certain "minorities groups" in California claiming that the tests are favorable to White students while "discriminatory to disadvantaged students of color".
Compton School District Among Groups Threatening to Sue UC System Unless It Drops the SAT
https://ktla.com/2019/10/29/ca-grou...llege-tests-favor-wealthy-white-students/amp/
Students of color to UC: Drop the SAT or we’ll see you in court
https://www.sfchronicle.com/education/amp/Students-of-color-to-UC-Drop-the-SAT-or-we-ll-14572455.php
California groups demand UC drop the SAT
https://www.latimes.com/california/...y-discriminate-against-disadvantaged-students
I'm gonna go ahead and assume that if the lawsuit does go forward, there is no plan for the anti-standardized exams activists to call the disadvantaged Asian-American students who actually study and do well on the SAT/ACT anyway to the Minorities witness stand.
This sort of policy will always weed out the better teachers and leave us with the worst. Mrs. Tirado was probably fantastic.
The bureaucrats who come up with these policies should be fired and perhaps tarred and feathered. They deserve scorn.
Well their stupidity is a huge reason for beginning this in the first place lolThis sounds like a really stupid lawsuit.
This is incorrect. IQ, or more speficially 'g' is very heritable. It's as genetic as height.But if you look at white Americans just 100 years ago based on WW 1 IQ tests of GIs, the average white American then would have an IQ of 80 today. So it's not a genetic thing.
80 IQ is above the entire continent of southern Africa (average IQ ~70). A person with an IQ of 70 is barely what you'd, as you said, be able to talk to as a fellow human. But southern African people clearly aren't that dumb. They're not, your words, 'drooling retards'. Talk to them and they seem like (since they are) normal human beings. There's clearly something wrong with the tests. It's a 2 way street though. There's also something wrong with the people taking the tests. What kind of culture produces students barely distinguishable from what's considered mentally retarded??This is incorrect. IQ, or more speficially 'g' is very heritable. It's as genetic as height.
If the average white IQ during WW1 was 80, they wouldn't have been fighting with artillery, guns, airplanes, submarines, etc. They would barely be able to form a cohesive unit and chuck a spear. 80 IQ is pretty much a drooling retard.
The tests are accurate, although not always very precise. IQ is not an end all be all, there are other characteristics that can make a person successful, just not in a mostly intelligence/complexity based system.80 IQ is above the entire continent of southern Africa (average IQ ~70). A person with an IQ of 70 is barely what you'd, as you said, be able to talk to as a fellow human. But southern African people clearly aren't that dumb. Talk to them and they seem like (since they are) normal human beings. There's clearly something wrong with the tests.
Someone with an IQ of 70 in America can't tie their shoes and is actually super retarded. The average sub saharran African tests the same as that "retard" on IQ tests but is clearly much more intelligent than that. The average white American scored that low 100 years ago; yet clearly us white people 100 years were ago able to tie our shoes and not drooling on them. The tests are measuring a cultural bias on some level.The tests are accurate, although not always very precise. IQ is not an end all be all, there are other characteristics that can make a person successful, just not in a mostly intelligence/complexity based system.
Normal is relative, normal for Africa? Sure. Would they be "normal" in Singapore? I doubt it.
I think there are two things going on:80 IQ is above the entire continent of southern Africa (average IQ ~70). A person with an IQ of 70 is barely what you'd, as you said, be able to talk to as a fellow human. But southern African people clearly aren't that dumb. They're not, your words, 'drooling retards'. Talk to them and they seem like (since they are) normal human beings. There's clearly something wrong with the tests. It's a 2 way street though. There's also something wrong with the people taking the tests. What kind of culture produces students barely distinguishable from what's considered mentally retarded??
Those biases somehow dont affect east asians. And blacks actually do better on the culturally weighed parts than on math/pattern parts.Someone with an IQ of 70 in America can't tie their shoes and is actually super retarded. The average sub saharran African tests the same as that "retard" on IQ tests but is clearly much more intelligent than that. The average white American scored that low 100 years ago; yet clearly us white people 100 years were ago able to tie our shoes and not drooling on them. The tests are measuring a cultural bias on some level.
I actually blame them less than the naive and patronizing idiot white progressives.