How funny that all 3 were saying Latifi didn't do any damage (which he didn't, but at least he actually got a complete take down, a few of them) against Lewis when he took him down and therefore it shouldn't play much of a factor in the decision. And yet, after the fight they were praising how the take downs made the difference in the Jones fight. WHAT TAKEDOWNS?? There weren't any where Reyes didn't get right back up. And this isn't about whether the judges should or shouldn't have scored it for Jones, it's about the commentators being so biased towards Jones. In the Latifi\Lewis fight, they...especially Joe, were making a case for Lewis winning the fight even though Latifi had several take downs with at least several minutes of top control, but then argue that Jones won because of his take downs? The whole fight, as usual, was very biased by the commentators.