- Joined
- Jul 14, 2017
- Messages
- 3,398
- Reaction score
- 1
Actually even with all those Kimbo numbers Bjorn's averaging more.
37 Bjorn events on Spike did 701k average (This includes PPV prelims)
Coker's 79 events are averaging 668k (This includes NYC PPV Prelims)
So they are close but Bjorn actually did better ratings with less production budget and payroll.
Those numbers aren't comparable since your using nearly double the amount of events Bjorn had....
When I did my comparison I did every event Bjorn did on spike vs an equal amount of shows from cokers takeover and Coker came ahead buddy.
Something more accurate then what you did would be using the last 37 events vs Bjorns 37 events.....but even that is fatally flawed.
The landscape of viewership is completely different so even using the model I suggested is basically assuming Bjorns numbers would have held up which clearly they wouldn't have.But comparing 37 events Bjorn did years ago vs 70+ events spanning the course of a few years and through the declining mma viewership landscape that Coker had endured is far from accurate or fair really.
Last edited: