Reports about bad ads should include the following:

1. Location/Country
2. Device
3. Browser
4. Company/product of ad.
5. A screen shot if possible,
6. Brief description of how the ad is a problem.
7. Page/Pages affected
8. Date and Time of occurrence.

Refer to the instructions for your device on how to take screen shots

Clarification regarding infraction

Discussion in 'Support' started by DhakaMMA, Dec 17, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DhakaMMA

    DhakaMMA Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,243
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    N.Y.C.
    I would like to know whether there is some system in place, that would allow a second Mod to review whether the Infraction given by another Mod, is justified or not?
     
  2. Nostromo

    Nostromo Guest

    yes there is, and in my opinion your infraction was warranted.
     
  3. DhakaMMA

    DhakaMMA Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,243
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    N.Y.C.
    Which one?
     
  4. Nostromo

    Nostromo Guest

    I assumed it to be the one that is currently still active.

    The other ones are expired and irrelevant at this point.
     
  5. DhakaMMA

    DhakaMMA Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,243
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    N.Y.C.
    How is it warranted? If california is rated "worst state", i cant chip in and say one of the reasons why i think its so? How is it breaking the rules. And i find it suspicious that its always when i talk about a certain specific topic that im targeted. Even though i comment on numerous issues. Just wondering.
     
  6. Nostromo

    Nostromo Guest

    The infraction you're referring to here expired 3 days ago.

    Your current infraction is for an anti-Semitic post you made in the WR.

    As rare as those are it still warranted the 1 pt infraction you received.
     
  7. DhakaMMA

    DhakaMMA Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,243
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    N.Y.C.
    What is this new one? I dont think i received any PM about it. But i did receive a PM about the one i just mentioned above, i would like to know whether that was justified or not. Because if not, it would fit with the trend that whenever i make any comment with regards to Zionism/Israel, im infracted by the same mod.

    I cant seem to fathom how pointing out "california has banned criticism of Israel" in a thread entitled "california declared worst state", is somehow 'trolling' according to the Mod in question. If you would like to see the notice/PM in question, i would gladly forward it to you.
     
  8. Nostromo

    Nostromo Guest

    Don't need the PM, I have access to it and I've seen it and we won't be discussing it any further here because that infraction is 2 weeks old and the topic is moot at this point.

    My suggestion to you now and in the future would be that if you have a question regarding an infraction, PM the mod you received it from as soon as you're able and ask for a clarification if you are unclear on the reason for getting it.

    IF you have any questions regarding your current infraction then to save you any potential embarrassment by posting it publicly here I would suggest you PM me for further clarification.
     
  9. Milgrim

    Milgrim Australopithecus - not your average hominid Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2006
    Messages:
    8,181
    Likes Received:
    11,664
    Location:
    Port Dalhousie
    This thread seems like a pretty good demonstration of the perils of an appeals/review system in a forum like this. It doubles the workload for mods - whenever one spends time dealing with an infraction another one will get stuck wasting more time arguing about it.
     
  10. Jukai

    Jukai Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2011
    Messages:
    14,948
    Likes Received:
    425
    Location:
    RIGHT BEHIND YOU
    Given DhakaMMA's incredible range of subject matter he writes about, I'm having so much trouble figuring out what he could have been reprimanded on... think, think, think....
     
  11. Joe_Armstrong

    Joe_Armstrong Starfleet Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2004
    Messages:
    13,070
    Likes Received:
    4,058
    Location:
    On the Balance
    Recent visitors on TS profile page : 4 mods.

    And still you need double clarification ?
     
  12. Nostromo

    Nostromo Guest

    The post that earned him the infraction was deleted, as is often the case.
     
  13. arrelione

    arrelione Member of the YES!!! Revolution

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    Messages:
    8,722
    Likes Received:
    821
    Where/How can I make a case to a second mod regarding my infraction?
     
  14. seatea

    seatea Black Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    Messages:
    5,856
    Likes Received:
    118
    ^I think you just did.
     
  15. Nnedd

    Nnedd Centaur Booty Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2007
    Messages:
    37,357
    Likes Received:
    1,505
    I thought the same thing.


    I would suggest alternatively, that if you want to dispute your infraction, send a nasty pm to the infracting moderator, then sit on it for a couple years, then lash out in a thread, lock that thread, and continue to let it stew.

    That seems like a healthy, emotional route.

    http://www.sherdog.net/forums/f75/i-have-beef-you-mathew-2109941/


    If this catches on like I think it will, I anticipate a slew of "I have beef with you Nostromo" threads.
     
  16. BAM

    BAM Back in the saddle again

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2006
    Messages:
    24,253
    Likes Received:
    8,282
    all infractions are seen by the mods and admins, if there is an issue mods are proactive in discussing it and if necessary coming up with alternatives. There is no appeals tribunal, it is done by the mods and admins internally. I'm closing this thread

    edit - 4 additional mods already weighed in on your infraction at the request of the mod that gave it to you, before your post was even made
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2013
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.