Clarification regarding infraction

[DhakaMMA]

I would like to know whether there is some system in place, that would allow a second Mod to review whether the Infraction given by another Mod, is justified or not?

 

[Nostromo]

yes there is, and in my opinion your infraction was warranted.

 

[DhakaMMA]

yes there is, and in my opinion your infraction was warranted.

Which one?

 

[Nostromo]

Which one?

I assumed it to be the one that is currently still active.

The other ones are expired and irrelevant at this point.

 

[DhakaMMA]

I assumed it to be the one that is currently still active.

The other ones are expired and irrelevant at this point.

How is it warranted? If california is rated "worst state", i cant chip in and say one of the reasons why i think its so? How is it breaking the rules. And i find it suspicious that its always when i talk about a certain specific topic that im targeted. Even though i comment on numerous issues. Just wondering.

 

[Nostromo]

How is it warranted? If california is rated "worst state", i cant chip in and say one of the reasons why i think its so? How is it breaking the rules. And i find it suspicious that its always when i talk about a certain specific topic that im targeted. Even though i comment on numerous issues. Just wondering.

The infraction you're referring to here expired 3 days ago.

Your current infraction is for an anti-Semitic post you made in the WR.

As rare as those are it still warranted the 1 pt infraction you received.

 

[DhakaMMA]

The infraction you're referring to here expired 3 days ago.

Your current infraction is for an anti-Semitic post you made in the WR.

As rare as those are it still warranted the 1 pt infraction you received.

What is this new one? I dont think i received any PM about it. But i did receive a PM about the one i just mentioned above, i would like to know whether that was justified or not. Because if not, it would fit with the trend that whenever i make any comment with regards to Zionism/Israel, im infracted by the same mod.

I cant seem to fathom how pointing out "california has banned criticism of Israel" in a thread entitled "california declared worst state", is somehow 'trolling' according to the Mod in question. If you would like to see the notice/PM in question, i would gladly forward it to you.

 

[Nostromo]

What is this new one? I dont think i received any PM about it. But i did receive a PM about the one i just mentioned above, i would like to know whether that was justified or not. Because if not, it would fit with the trend that whenever i make any comment with regards to Zionism/Israel, im infracted by the same mod.

I cant seem to fathom how pointing out "california has banned criticism of Israel" in a thread entitled "california declared worst state", is somehow 'trolling' according to the Mod in question. If you would like to see the notice/PM in question, i would gladly forward it to you.

Don't need the PM, I have access to it and I've seen it and we won't be discussing it any further here because that infraction is 2 weeks old and the topic is moot at this point.

My suggestion to you now and in the future would be that if you have a question regarding an infraction, PM the mod you received it from as soon as you're able and ask for a clarification if you are unclear on the reason for getting it.

IF you have any questions regarding your current infraction then to save you any potential embarrassment by posting it publicly here I would suggest you PM me for further clarification.

 

[Milgrim]

This thread seems like a pretty good demonstration of the perils of an appeals/review system in a forum like this. It doubles the workload for mods - whenever one spends time dealing with an infraction another one will get stuck wasting more time arguing about it.

 

[Jukai]

Given DhakaMMA's incredible range of subject matter he writes about, I'm having so much trouble figuring out what he could have been reprimanded on... think, think, think....

 

[Joe_Armstrong]

Recent visitors on TS profile page : 4 mods.

And still you need double clarification ?

 

[Nostromo]

Given DhakaMMA's incredible range of subject matter he writes about, I'm having so much trouble figuring out what he could have been reprimanded on... think, think, think....

The post that earned him the infraction was deleted, as is often the case.

 

[arrelione]

yes there is, and in my opinion your infraction was warranted.

Where/How can I make a case to a second mod regarding my infraction?

 

[seatea]

^I think you just did.

 

[Nnedd]

^I think you just did.

I thought the same thing.


I would suggest alternatively, that if you want to dispute your infraction, send a nasty pm to the infracting moderator, then sit on it for a couple years, then lash out in a thread, lock that thread, and continue to let it stew.

That seems like a healthy, emotional route.

http://www.sherdog.net/forums/f75/i-have-beef-you-mathew-2109941/


If this catches on like I think it will, I anticipate a slew of "I have beef with you Nostromo" threads.

 

[BAM]

Where/How can I make a case to a second mod regarding my infraction?

all infractions are seen by the mods and admins, if there is an issue mods are proactive in discussing it and if necessary coming up with alternatives. There is no appeals tribunal, it is done by the mods and admins internally. I'm closing this thread

edit - 4 additional mods already weighed in on your infraction at the request of the mod that gave it to you, before your post was even made