City of Paris plans to sue Fox News

I hope it goes to court but not soo sure the Paris mayor will thought since this opens up a can of worms.
How so? France has some stupid speech restrictions but that's irrelevant. This would be about slander and libel.
 
oh i saw the place i grew up become unrecognizable, only it wasn't muslims but mexicans.

islamic rape gangs? where the fuck do you live that these are a problem for you? no wonder you are so scared, you have to worry about being raped. lol! thank god in oxnard we don't rape men, that's gross, so i never had to worry about that.

where do you live btw? i'm always down for a good time, but i am not going to be too scared of a bunch of stupid muslims, and i won't be running from them idiots either. i'd rather fight a muslim than a shit load of shermed out gang bangers who want to kill you just for the fuck of it.

so don't worry brah, i'll protect you from the muslims! lol, you scared of a couple muslims with british accents who were so tough they literally poured out a guy's beer and then said "have a good day." LMAO!

btw the vanilla ice of the war room is TCK, it's already been decided long ago.

I don't want protection from muslims...that's a retarded statement. I know muslims and muslims know me, and I don't have problems with them so I don't know where you are going with that. The crux of this is extremism so try and stay on topic and avoid the blanket statements/incriminations.

The one thing my interaction with you which has given me thought, is the comparison between the way these idiots act and how you have similar problems in the US with ghetto's that are sometimes racist places, the only difference is that this stuff has been happening at an ever increasing pace over the last 10 years or so.

Any kind of an affiliation that represents a threat to me or my children is obviously going to be problematic to me. If there was a problem with radical gay atheistic dwarfs hacking peoples heads off in broad daylight then I would have a major issue with them too, especially if there was more and more of them coming into the country and being vocal about wanting to kill us all.

It's all fun and games...until there is a string of regularly occurring massacres with the all too real threat of more to come. everytime I see a new headline, I wonder to myself "do they get it yet"?, but of course you don't. I don't like to lose an argument, but this is one issue that I hate to be right on. Europe is on the verge of a major shitstorm, and its because of a major clash of cultures, has nothing to do with race, or xenophobia
 
It is because they said Paris has no go zones for non-Muslims.

I thought Paris did have them but I don't know if it is true or not.

Does Paris have no go zones or not?

No, in a really basic sense, they do not. There arent any shariah only areas, or any of the other trash they have been spreading. Jindal got called out on that too.
 
free speech is one thing, but it seems like fixed news just outright started lying, and if that hurts tourism in paris, then they have every right to seek justice. that's how i see this, i doubt they will win, but fox has just been outright lying, that idiot jindal too.

Fox did fuck up, and it might have some small impact on tourism, but gov'ts shouldn't be able to sue for being badmouthed, even if it's inaccurate.
 


yeah, I can imagine that Islamic extremists in paris are nothing like they are in London :rolleyes:


If these are the dangerous parts of London/Paris (no go at night) then you people better as far away as possible from the bad places in LA at night LMAO. You def won't be escorted out like this LOL.
 
How so? France has some stupid speech restrictions but that's irrelevant. This would be about slander and libel.

Can of worms = talking about North African immigrant neighborhoods and how they are areas people tend to avoid.

France , due to an old law from around 1900, does not even keep census on racial and religious demographics. Ofcourse they could change the law but haven't; probably don't want people to talk about a topic they consider sensitive.
 
i think fox knows this count be a problem which is why they apologized as quickly as they could.

I am aware they apologized or retracted their Birmingham claim but not aware they did the same about Paris. I am not aware Fox ever claimed Paris was a no-go zone for non Muslims.
 
If these are the dangerous parts of London/Paris (no go at night) then you people better as far away as possible from the bad places in LA at night LMAO. You def won't be escorted out like this LOL.

Oh I know that..i would walk anywhere in London, but I wouldn't go walkies in watts, or late night stomping in Compton. cant say that I would like to walk around in some of the US's other ghetto's either. The danger from some of the elements of these communities is that they don't confront you like hood "G's" or "wannabe's" they come from nowhere and attack civilians for maximum damage screaming to their god.
 
I don't want protection from muslims...that's a retarded statement. I know muslims and muslims know me, and I don't have problems with them so I don't know where you are going with that. The crux of this is extremism so try and stay on topic and avoid the blanket statements/incriminations.

The one thing my interaction with you which has given me thought, is the comparison between the way these idiots act and how you have similar problems in the US with ghetto's that are sometimes racist places, the only difference is that this stuff has been happening at an ever increasing pace over the last 10 years or so.

Any kind of an affiliation that represents a threat to me or my children is obviously going to be problematic to me. If there was a problem with radical gay atheistic dwarfs hacking peoples heads off in broad daylight then I would have a major issue with them too, especially if there was more and more of them coming into the country and being vocal about wanting to kill us all.

It's all fun and games...until there is a string of regularly occurring massacres with the all too real threat of more to come. everytime I see a new headline, I wonder to myself "do they get it yet"?, but of course you don't. I don't like to lose an argument, but this is one issue that I hate to be right on. Europe is on the verge of a major shitstorm, and its because of a major clash of cultures, has nothing to do with race, or xenophobia

the muslims are getting attention recently, but i saw my city go from a nice place to a shit hole in a matter of years, so it's nothing new to me.
 
Fox did fuck up, and it might have some small impact on tourism, but gov'ts shouldn't be able to sue for being badmouthed, even if it's inaccurate.
May well be the case but I don't see how it is comparable to discussions of free speech.
 
What exactly did Fox say?

How is a no-go area defined. I saw it mentioned in Swedish site and something related to Michigan. Is there an accepted definition?
 
I am not aware of Fox claiming Paris was a no-go zone for non Muslims. If they said certain areas of Paris then that can be argued .

There is no area in Paris where Whites can't go. I stayed in Barb
 
They arrested a Dieudonne like, a day afterwards for free speech, too. Many people are being jailed with summary speed.

The Front Nationale is being oppressed.

France: What else is new?
 
By the way, blatant lies spread by medias shouldn't not be covered by freedom of speech. What they said is not an opinion or an analysis, it is a pure willingly orchestrated lie. It's in the same category as perjury.

Sounds like something an authoritarian would say before shutting down the news outlets criticizing him. That's kind of a problem.

Problems caused by free speech can be much more safely resolved by more free speech. In the case of Fox they already issued corrections themselves as the article points out. Feel free to advertise your version of the truth further.
 
They kept touting free speech, but didn't they imprison a charlie hebdo cartoonist for making fun of jews?
 
Back
Top