Law Citizenship Question on 2020 Census CANCELLED

Discussion in 'The War Room' started by JamesRussler, Apr 24, 2019.

  1. JamesRussler

    JamesRussler You can call me Jimmy Double Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2015
    Messages:
    8,884
    Likes Received:
    14,397
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Yes. The Conservative Supreme Court is poised to allow a citizenship question on the 2020 census.

    https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/04/23/politics/supreme-court-census-question-oral-arguments/index.html

    The Constitution requires a census every 10 years to determine the number of PEOPLE living in each state, not the number of CITIZENS! We allocate House seats and electoral votes based on the number of PEOPLE residing in the states, not the number of CITIZENS!

    Because of this citizenship question, more undocumented citizens will refuse to answer the census, with mucho-undocumented states (such as CA and NY) receiving fewer seats in the House, and fewer electoral votes. This citizenship question is clearly designed to disenfranchise undocumented citizens and deprive them of the representation in Congress!

    That’s why a coalition of states sued POTUS Trump and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross to stop them from putting the citizenship question. They have no right to ask! It’s none of your business who is a citizen! Fuck off Nazi scum!

    Sadly, there are 5 Conservative judges on the Supreme Court, and they appear unwilling to rein in the Trump administration’s egregious overreach. This is probably one of the worst things ever to happen in our time. It’s like the Trail of Tears all over again.

    The SCOTUS opinion will come out around June.

    Thoughts? Discuss.
     
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2019
  2. BudKing8806

    BudKing8806 Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2017
    Messages:
    4,367
    Likes Received:
    9,162
    I'm disappointed. I'm disgruntled. I'm another dis word that I don't even know.
     
  3. EradiatedHaggis

    EradiatedHaggis Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,497
    Likes Received:
    6,967
    <Fedor23>

    It worked for the first near 200 years of the life of the nation. We had it until the 1950s.
     
    uppercutbus, glenwo2 and JamesRussler like this.
  4. JamesRussler

    JamesRussler You can call me Jimmy Double Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2015
    Messages:
    8,884
    Likes Received:
    14,397
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    I can’t even
     
  5. Gunny

    Gunny Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    16,366
    Likes Received:
    12,610
    Location:
    Naperville

    So racist. So bigoted. So evil
     
  6. JDragon

    JDragon #StayTheFuckHome Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2010
    Messages:
    15,211
    Likes Received:
    21,096
    Location:
    Germany
    I don't see a problem there.

    Why don't you get rid of the race question instead?
     
    JonesBones, lilelvis, Sohei and 2 others like this.
  7. vengeful

    vengeful Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2017
    Messages:
    3,971
    Likes Received:
    7,501
    What's stopping non-citizens from lying and saying they're a citizen exactly? Or just refusing to answer that 1 question?
     
  8. Kitafuji

    Kitafuji Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2009
    Messages:
    2,501
    Likes Received:
    2,311
    Location:
    Mt. Fuji
    The question is fair and needed.
     
  9. Dirt Road Soldier

    Dirt Road Soldier All Praise To The Gun!

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Messages:
    5,448
    Likes Received:
    8,252
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Nothing at all. You aren't even required to fill it out, let alone fill it out honestly.
     
    glenwo2 likes this.
  10. woodguyatl

    woodguyatl Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2014
    Messages:
    3,685
    Likes Received:
    3,079
    I’m racking my brain to think of some other things that we had for a long time that we don’t anymore.

    In the end, this issue will prove less important than the end of gerrymandering.
     
    LangfordBarrow likes this.
  11. woodguyatl

    woodguyatl Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2014
    Messages:
    3,685
    Likes Received:
    3,079
    It hasn’t been enforced since 1970 but completing the census is legally required and not doing so can get you a $5000 fine.
     
  12. Caudillo

    Caudillo Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2019
    Messages:
    1,538
    Likes Received:
    1,105
    Location:
    Your wife has had bigger than you in her past
    Birthright citizenship needs to be taken up next.

    And so should mass deportations
     
    JonesBones, uppercutbus, Dr J and 2 others like this.
  13. Gunny

    Gunny Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    16,366
    Likes Received:
    12,610
    Location:
    Naperville

    That probably comes after the question of whether non-citizens should count when apportioning congressional districts and the electoral college. Currently they do which means votes in heavy non-citizen districts and states effective count for more than those of everyone else.
     
  14. Culombo

    Culombo Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2015
    Messages:
    3,202
    Likes Received:
    3,605
    not that big of a deal .. people can just lie or not answer it .. I heard on the news that something like 17% had answered that question when it was included from 1971-2000
     
    glenwo2 likes this.
  15. JamesRussler

    JamesRussler You can call me Jimmy Double Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2015
    Messages:
    8,884
    Likes Received:
    14,397
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Technically the law requires people to complete the census form and complete it truthfully, though it’s my understanding that the law hasn’t been enforced strictly.
     
    glenwo2 likes this.
  16. panamaican

    panamaican Senior Moderator Staff Member Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    37,913
    Likes Received:
    40,119
    It's irrelevant to the Census. But that's a different question from if they can add it. There might be some legitimacy to the concern about under-reporting.

    The Constitution says the Census is to record the number of "Persons" in a state so as to allocate Representatives, including 3/5ths for slaves. That's in the same area where they clearly delineate "Citizen" as a prerequisite to being a Representative. I think it's clear that "Person" and "Citizen" aren't meant to be the same thing as far as counting for Representative allocation. It's about how many people are in your state, not how many citizens. And so any voter based argument seems moot to me.

    Accuracy is the most important element. I haven't read the briefs, I'd be curious about the data supporting the assertion that the question will result in underreporting.
     
    Hungry Joe, Higus and ChainFlow like this.
  17. Farmer Br0wn

    Farmer Br0wn Farmer Br0wn belt

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Messages:
    7,687
    Likes Received:
    10,393
    Location:
    Earth
    If accuracy is of the utmost importance, wouldn't it be helpful to accurately know how many illegal immigrants live in any particular area?

    There's absolutely no reason this data shouldn't be collected.
     
    uppercutbus, glenwo2 and JamesRussler like this.
  18. panamaican

    panamaican Senior Moderator Staff Member Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    37,913
    Likes Received:
    40,119
    Not for the Census. The Census, per the Constitution, doesn't care at all about anything except the total number of people.
    https://www.census.gov/history/pdf/Article_1_Section_2.pdf

    Race, age, gender, etc. are all irrelevant. Head count is what matters.

    Also, legal residents (green card holders) are not citizens.
     
    Higus likes this.
  19. JamesRussler

    JamesRussler You can call me Jimmy Double Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2015
    Messages:
    8,884
    Likes Received:
    14,397
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Let’s set aside the substance of these policy judgments and instead focus on who is allowed to make them. Under the Census Act, Congress authorized Wilbur Ross, as Secretary of Commerce, to administer the census, and nowhere have they disallowed use of a citizenship question. He was vested with a wide range of discretion about how to accomplish that goal. By contrast, Congress has, since 1976, prohibited mandatory questions about religion on the census form. So if Congress has authority to vest and divest the Commerce Secretary of discretion in administering the census, why should the Court step in?
     
  20. Farmer Br0wn

    Farmer Br0wn Farmer Br0wn belt

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Messages:
    7,687
    Likes Received:
    10,393
    Location:
    Earth
    If the census asks any question at all beyond simple head count, then their is no justifiable reason not to ask about citizenship status.

    We use the census to compile all kinds of data about our population. This is just another data point. The resistance to this notion is disproportionate to the actual importance of the data that will be compiled.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.