Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by Credo, Oct 11, 2021.
Got a link to Big John talking about this?
This is correct in the state of California.
It is obviously more than a typical”he said she said”
a-the entire world is out to get him, and that he has the worst luck ever
B-he is a grown adult, who continuously messes up badly, so people don’t give him the benefit of the doubt
A dented car, video recording, and literal blood is not circumstantial
"he beats the mother of his children in front of them."
for some reason, you seem unwilling to acknowledge there is only circumstantial evidence to this. you want to make it about other things.....
and i get him not getting the benefit of the doubt and people believing he's a scumbag and did bad things.
More fairy tales with zero factual basis for anything you’re blabbering in circles about
Thanks, braddah. Perfect timestamps too!
Maybe you three will concede and/or apologize after you hear Big John (former LA cop) tell you exactly what I've been telling you for the last few days? He even gives an example of a call he was on himself. I doubt any of you will, but it would show maturity and humbleness on your part. Cheers, friends.
You didn’t answer my question. What are the stats for the non-incarcerated population?
If I’m not incarcerated, why do I care about the incarcerated statistics? Why do you think they are relevant?
I know I know, it's my fault. I should dumb down my points to meet your intellect. Unfortunately I can't even pretend to be that stupid. It's ok we'll come back to this in a few years once (if) you've matured mentally.
Dude you are talking to a wall.....actually you'd probably have better luck with that.
I don't try to win arguments with people like you on an mma forum lol, which seems to be why you're here. I give my opinions, take them or leave them. In this case I am interested in the truth of what really happened. After reviewing all facts available this is what I believe happened:
The Liddell's go to a party. They are probably loaded. They get home and an argument breaks out. It gets physical at some point but doesn't seem severe and there are no injuries. Someone calls the cops and when they get there, chuck and his wife start blaming each other. The cops find no injuries and can't determine who physically started the domestic altercation, although they believe one did occur. According to law or protocol, they must arrest one or both. The kid/kids are awake watching the situation and Chuck wants to save them the trauma of seeing their mother led away in cuffs so he says he would like to be the one arrested if it meant that she wouldn't be. But he didn't do this for her, he did it for his child/children and he is still extremely pissed at his wife. As soon as he gets out the next day, he blames her for everything, says she has ongoing mental problems and that the truth would come out.
And that's where we stand as of now
You're a child. Did you listen to what John said? He spoke to officers involved and they said Chuck's statement is essentially exactly what happened. He had marks on him, she didn't, and he asked to go to jail in her place. For fuck's sake. Man up, kid.
In a way, you're both right.
Heisenberg says relax.
Dude, you're completely insufferable. Just like kflo. Good day
Nah, man. He's been fighting reality for days. Is normal.
...bro you're wrong. I've been arrested and charged before. The police did not charge me. They arrested me because it appeared to them that it was highly likely I had committed a crime. I was released in a few hours and charged with a hit and run (street sign on a highway not a person) two weeks later once the DA reviewed the arrest.
It's a terminology thing but you're not "charged" by LEO. Only the prosecutor can file charges.
Carry on though
What state do you live in? Traffic and criminal cases are very different, by the way, and how things are handled can vary from state to state. Were you booked? Was there a bond? Was it a felony hit and run, or misdemeanor?
They glossed over the entire probable cause part. Josh is incorrect saying any time they are called someone has to go to jail. Nothing John said contradicted anything I said either, you are reading into his omission of facts as proof of something. He didn't mention what chuck or the guy in his example said at the point before getting arrested eg "I physically assaulted her" leading to the cops to arrest them.
Surprise surprise! Another stubborn child refusing to admit they were wrong. Did you also not listen or watch? Goddamn.
Separate names with a comma.