International Charred bodies, burned homes: A 'campaign of terror' in Myanmar

LeonardoBjj

Professional Wrestler
@red
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
9,523
Reaction score
12,125
Satellite images show villages in ashes in Myanmar's Sagaing. Survivors say the army is burning opponents' homes and killing those who could not flee.

By Zaheena Rasheed and Nu Nu Lusan
Published On 12 May 202312 May 2023

The villagers of Kone Ywar in central Myanmar had two hours to flee.

It was February 28. Columns of soldiers were approaching the village along its main roads to the north and west. There was only one way out - a dirt path to the east with a small bridge over the Yama stream. The bridge could only take motorbikes, no cars or bullock carts.

“There were about 1,000 of us. And only one exit for everyone,” said Kyaw Hsan Oo, a resident of Kone Ywar. “It was terrifying, difficult and chaotic.”

Shortly after the soldiers marched into Kone Ywar, the residents of the farming village watched in despair from afar as huge clouds of smoke began billowing up across their paddy farms, in the direction of their homes.

Kyaw Hsan Oo, a 30-year-old utility worker, said he returned to Kone Ywar the next day to find most of the village of about 600 households razed to the ground. The wooden and brick homes of some 386 families were destroyed, along with all of their belongings - clothes, furniture, pots and pans - leaving them homeless, with just the clothes on their backs.

Worse, returning villagers found the bodies of two 50-year-old men who had been unable to flee because of poor health. They had been shot.

The charred body of a third man was found in the ruins of his home.

“Those villagers were innocent,” said Kyaw Hsan Oo. “They are not part of the resistance, just simple villagers. This is brutal and inhumane.”


Kone Ywar was targeted, according to Kyaw Hsan Oo, because of its support for Myanmar’s jailed elected leader Aung San Suu Kyi, whose government was
toppled in a coup in February 2021. The military, led by Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, justified the power grab with unsubstantiated claims of fraud in elections the previous November which had returned Aung San Suu Kyi and her National League for Democracy (NLD) to power in a landslide.

The coup triggered mass protests across the country, including in Kone Ywar, where residents took to the streets in near-daily shows of defiance. The military cracked down with brutal force, shooting and killing unarmed protesters in cities and towns across the country, including in the biggest cities of Yangon and Mandalay. Despairing of securing change by peaceful means, the people of Myanmar have since taken up arms against the military in what a shadow administration set up by deposed legislators, the National Unity Government (NUG), has called a people’s uprising.

More than two years since the power grab, violence has engulfed vast swathes of the Southeast Asian country of 53 million people. The United Nations estimates the military has killed at least 2,940 civilians and detained more than 17,000 people, creating a “catastrophic” situation for human rights in Myanmar. The military’s indiscriminate use of air raids, artillery shelling and clashes with groups opposed to its rule - including ethnic armed groups and civilian militias known as the People’s Defence Forces (PDFs) - has displaced more than 1.5 million people nationwide and left some 17.6 million in need of humanitarian assistance.

Nowhere has the violence been as intense as in the Sagaing region of central Myanmar, where Kone Ywar is located and where reports indicate near-daily confrontations between resistance forces and soldiers, air attacks, bombings and torching of homes. The UN said it has documented at least 1,200 killings in Sagaing alone, and the razing of tens of thousands of homes - actions that it said may amount to war crimes.

The military has restricted access to Sagaing and imposes communications blackouts on an ad hoc basis, hampering journalists from reporting on the escalating conflict in the region.

Satellite images obtained by Al Jazeera’s Sanad Investigative Unit, however, reveal widespread destruction in the area, with some villages nearly completely or partially turned to ashes. Survivors from several villages told Al Jazeera by telephone that soldiers killed anyone who was too old or infirm to flee, stole valuables from their homes, destroyed documents such as identity papers and set fire to buildings and food supplies. The torchings have left hundreds of thousands of people in Sagaing in need of urgent food aid and shelter, according to the UN and local charity groups.

“They target all the villages that are not accepting them or resisting them,” said Kyaw Hsan Oo. “They burn any village that does not agree with them. And kill anyone who does not listen or obey them.”

The military, which calls itself the State Administration Council (SAC), did not respond to repeated calls and emails from Al Jazeera seeking comment.

Myanmar's central plains - home to the Buddhist-Bamar people, the country's main ethnic group - were the seat of most pre-colonial Burmese kingdoms. The semi-arid region, also known as the Dry Zone, is crisscrossed by the Irawaddy and Chindwin rivers, and populated mostly by famers, who grow crops including rice and legumes.

Before the 2021 coup, it was largely spared the fighting that broke out between Myanmar's military and the country’s various ethnic minority groups following independence in 1948.

The post-coup violence in the central plains - which includes the Sagaing, Magway and Mandalay divisions - is a “new phenomenon”, according to Shona Loong, associate fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). “Armed conflict on this scale has not occurred in the Dry Zone, nor among Myanmar’s Buddhist-Bamar population, since the country’s independence.”

On one side are the PDFs, which are aligned with the NUG. On the other are the military and its allied militias, known as the Pyu Saw Htee. The Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED), a monitoring group, estimates that there were 950 PDFs in the Dry Zone at the end of February this year, a number that comprises nearly half of all such armed groups active in Myanmar.

So far, the PDFs have used three main tactics to wear down the military - bombings with improvised explosive devices, targeted assassinations and ambushes on military convoys, according to Loong’s research, based on ACLED data.

When the PDFs were first gaining traction in the Dry Zone in 2021, the military primarily deployed live fire against them, she found. Then in January 2022, the military turned to air raids, targeting PDF camps, stockpiles and pro-resistance villages. And in April of that year, the military began ratcheting up the destruction of infrastructure, mostly by burning houses and villages to the ground - “to root out resistance forces concealed among civilians”.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/long...urned-homes-a-campaign-of-terror-in-myanmar-2

- I avoid creating more than one thread on a single forum on the same day. But this one was too horrible to pass.
Incridable that a Shao-Khan invasion or even The Cobra Commander taking power, wond't be as nightmarish as how or world is in real life.:(
 
They spent generations as a hermit kingdom, not unlike North Korea.

Then, they slowly opened up to the world.

Then, in a blink of an eye, they went back to darkness.

So effing sad.
Seeing how quickly places like Myanmar, Sudan, and Ethiopia unravel after a little liberalization gives me greater appreciation for the dictators that came before them.

It’s not good obviously but it makes sense why they would have seemingly destructive economic & social policy.
 
CharmingMintyKiskadee-max-1mb.gif
 
If only they had oil.

Granted it’s ripping off a Key and Peele skit but I think it’d be a great movie idea for a country to pretend it has a resource the US needs to cause military intervention and then whoopsie daisy, turns out they lied. Sort of the reverse of our last few military operations where we had to lie our way into it.
 
They spent generations as a hermit kingdom, not unlike North Korea.

Then, they slowly opened up to the world.

Then, in a blink of an eye, they went back to darkness.

So effing sad.


During that narrow window my mates went but I chose to go Laos instead, they loved it so I've always fancied it but can't see that happening maybe ever. Such a fucked country
 

Myanmar has a shit ton of precious stones. The best jade in the world, tons of rubies, sapphires, etc. They've got so much that villagers literally sift the river water at the exit of gem mines to scoop up the small gemstones that were missed. Every year they have massive gem auctions where you can buy tons of rubies and huge boulders of jade. The selling of gems have slowed down since the 2021 coup though.
 
Myanmar has a shit ton of precious stones. The best jade in the world, tons of rubies, sapphires, etc. They've got so much that villagers literally sift the river water at the exit of gem mines to scoop up the small gemstones that were missed. Every year they have massive gem auctions where you can buy tons of rubies and huge boulders of jade. The selling of gems have slowed down since the 2021 coup though.
Elon might persuade the government to introduce freedom once he starts thinking about selling

giphy.gif
 
Seeing how quickly places like Myanmar, Sudan, and Ethiopia unravel after a little liberalization gives me greater appreciation for the dictators that came before them.

It’s not good obviously but it makes sense why they would have seemingly destructive economic & social policy.
Or maybe those destructive economic and social policies are partly why these societies are so prone to collapse after liberalization
 
It’s not good obviously but it makes sense why they would have seemingly destructive economic & social policy.

Or maybe those destructive economic and social policies are partly why these societies are so prone to collapse after liberalization

This, as much as @Yehudim "realpolitik" approach makes sense in theory in reality these brutal dictatorships set everything in a way that its connected to the dictatorship itself, so its pretty much normal for anarchy to come after a dictatorship steps down.

Much different from dictatorships that are not as brutal and rely more on civilian "collaborator" institutions.

For example Chile under Pinochet.

As much hate as Pinochet gets as the poster boy of Latin American XX dictators his regime was nowhere as repressive (for a military dictatorship in Latin America that is, this in no way ought to be presented as apologism) and relied a lot on civilians to do most of the running of the country, ironically those civilians made it so that the country didn't needed the military to be run so once Pinochet stepped down after tons of social mobilization the country managed to transition to elections peacefully and eventually removed all the legacy of the dictatorship with the Lagos Constitutional reform.

This wouldn't be possible on the other hand on a regime like Venezuela or Cuba, where virtually everything is run by military or security services and the country can't do without them, if they were removed in the end the country would collapse or any new government would rely on them so much that they would still run the show to a point where they could do a re-coup like the one in Myanmar.
 
Or maybe those destructive economic and social policies are partly why these societies are so prone to collapse after liberalization
Not a good explanation when these are societies that have never been any kind of liberal at any point in their history, and are clearly not a voluntary association of people.

The concept of locking down your economy and kingdom isn’t a 20th century post-colonial invention, we’ve seen it with the Byzantine’s and China before. It’s just a way of keeping together a very fragile society.
 
Not a good explanation when these are societies that have never been any kind of liberal at any point in their history, and are clearly not a voluntary association of people.

The concept of locking down your economy and kingdom isn’t a 20th century post-colonial invention, we’ve seen it with the Byzantine’s and China before. It’s just a way of keeping together a very fragile society.
Lots of societies have little to no history of liberalism until they do and you can hold together societies that are large and diverse without a military junta. India and Indonesia are far from perfect but they're both far less autocratic while being larger and more diverse. Virtually no country is really a voluntary association of people and there are territorial disputes to this day regarding minorities even in sable regions like Western Europe so I don't think that necessitates dictatorship

The problem is more so what @Rod1 is getting at; having a large, highly politicized military-intelligence apparatus. Tunisia and Egypt are very similar in terms of their history but the latter has a massive military with its fingers deep into the economy and governance so it reverted to authoritarianism much more quickly and with extreme violence. Tunisia has a smaller, more neutral military so it was easier to overthrow the dictator and even when there is backsliding its with the complicity of certain civil society institutions like trade unions rather than through sheer force.

If you look at the history of the Burmese military it has its origins in WWI when the Japanese wanted to install a puppet state in Burma after "liberating" it from the British so it wasn't exactly designed a neutral institution to be subservient to civilian authorities.
 
Not a good explanation when these are societies that have never been any kind of liberal at any point in their history, and are clearly not a voluntary association of people.

None are until they are.

The concept of locking down your economy and kingdom isn’t a 20th century post-colonial invention, we’ve seen it with the Byzantine’s and China before. It’s just a way of keeping together a very fragile society.

A society that is fragile precisely because of bad governance, kind of an egg/chicken conundrum.
 
Back
Top