Even though I think the criticisms of Chandler ITT are ridiculous, I actually agree with this.
RDA is good everywhere.
He had a grappling-heavy diet of opponents at 170 and held up surprisingly well IMO (especially against Colby and Fighter Kevin). He might not be as physically strong at 155, but unless Chandler is a very good wrestler I do not think he’d be able to take and keep RDA down, or do any damage, and to the extent that he did he would likely become exhausted. Not only is he a threat to get back up, but he can absolutely sweep Chandler and work GNP or a sub of his own (like he did to FKL).
Standing he isn’t a huge knockout threat but he can definitely fight in a phone booth if that’s what you want.
The bottom line is that while we don’t know exactly how RDA will look back at 155, he’s not a guy that you beat, let alone look great against, unless you’re really good. Chandler’s best shot to look great is probably the Eddie blueprint (aka his own blueprint against Bendo recently). If he does that, Rogan can gush about what a test this was against a former champ and how Chandler just did what nobody has been able to do since Alvarez. Absent that big KO it would probably be a great test of all of Chandler’s skills. If he passes the test and looks good doing it, no reason at all that he can’t go right into a huge fight next.
So I don’t disagree with those of you who like the matchup. It would not have shocked me if they’d done something like this.
However, I do think that there’s one variable that might be being overlooked (on the UFC side that is). A lot of you are focused on “making him earn it,” which is understandable, but that’s a very Chandler-centric point of view. To you, the UFC is giving Chandler something unfairly. But by hyping Chandler, among other things, the UFC is ensuring that he’ll be a big scalp for whoever beats him. Will Brooks was mentioned earlier, and I think the company made a big mistake with him. Does anyone even remember the guys who beat him? Whether you do or you don’t, they certainly didn’t get any sort of career jolt from it. They’ve handled Chandler much differently, and as a result whoever beats him is going to feel like a major contender. Does RDA fit the bill? Not really IMO. The smart thing would be, IMO, for the company to put itself into a win-win scenario. If Chandler beats someone like Ferguson, Poirier, McGregor, etc., he’s a big star. If they beat him, they’re right back on track as championship material (in a way that Poirier was not by beating Dan Hooker).