- Joined
- Sep 19, 2008
- Messages
- 10,684
- Reaction score
- 13
I actually agree with Dana, Chad rightly got the shot over Frankie, he had only ever lost once in the UFC which was in a 5 round war to Aldo that he arguably won, he decimated Lamas whilst Edgar bored the shit out of half the world against Faber in a very unimpressive performance.
All was fair Chad was #1 and got the shot, Chad was also the much tougher match up for Conor, Frankie doesnt have the power to even trouble Conor anyone thinking so is just nuthugger/delusional Conor destroys him and I didnt say Conor would destroy Chad because I knew Chad had a chance.
I honestly dont even think Frankie has a punchers chance against a guy who hits like Conor. We all seen what Maynard did to him lets face it he was extremely lucky that fight wasnt stopped.
The real fair thing to do would have been to give Frankie a title shot after he mauled Cub Swanson for five rounds. The timing of the Faber fight also made zero sense (and I don't care what anyone says about Frankie for that fight; Faber was losing, it was his responsibility to try and make something happen and he never pulled the trigger).
Chad and Frankie were actually going back and forth with the #1 spot around the time of the Mendes/McGregor announcement as well. I also have to disagree and say Frankie is a worse match up for Conor than Chad is solely because he could've put Conor on his back as well, and he would have had the cardio to do it for five rounds.