If you are going to get your masters you might as well get your PhD. In most schools if you do research you get a stipend and tuition waver to go to school. You do not need a masters to get a PhD. Plus a masters is similar (somtimes the same) classes and you don't get paid and have to pay to go to school. Only benefit of a masters is it is 2 years instead of 4.
I dunno, if you add it up I think a PhD is much better. That is just to get paid more though. I think you can learn as much functional knoweldge from reading and getting certs. Some of those certs are hard, I know a PhD who was afraid to take the latest strength and conditioning test because it was supposed to be so hard. It was by ACSM I think.
I dunno, if you add it up I think a PhD is much better. That is just to get paid more though. I think you can learn as much functional knoweldge from reading and getting certs. Some of those certs are hard, I know a PhD who was afraid to take the latest strength and conditioning test because it was supposed to be so hard. It was by ACSM I think.