question do any of you feel you have a bias against a certain style-approach-strategy; to the point where you can't be fair in regards to the pluses/minuses when discussing certain styles.
obviously we have a way we think is the truth and maximizes abilities/advantages and minimizes weaknesses and disadvantages; but the truth is there are a variety of ways to solve most problems, all dependent on your phys skillset-frame-body type-mindset-temperament-etc etc.
so can you appreciate what others do, or the results they get; i understand being objective and commenting on what you see, but if all you see is bad or good in anyones approach you probably have a bias one way or another. An that limits you ability to appreciate or assess another fighters/opponent/sparring partner/instructor.
obviously we have a way we think is the truth and maximizes abilities/advantages and minimizes weaknesses and disadvantages; but the truth is there are a variety of ways to solve most problems, all dependent on your phys skillset-frame-body type-mindset-temperament-etc etc.
so can you appreciate what others do, or the results they get; i understand being objective and commenting on what you see, but if all you see is bad or good in anyones approach you probably have a bias one way or another. An that limits you ability to appreciate or assess another fighters/opponent/sparring partner/instructor.