- Joined
- Apr 3, 2016
- Messages
- 1,352
- Reaction score
- 26
Yeah. You ain't gonna do shitSo you think we're just gonna sit here and let him kill us???
Yeah. You ain't gonna do shitSo you think we're just gonna sit here and let him kill us???
I applaud your choice. I was giving advice to a female friend a few months back. She being in the middle of a somewhat heated divorce. I had to remove myself from the whole scene. She seriously would not put two brain cells together with any of her decisions, plus her counsel had a lot to be desired.If it helps your decision, I specifically cater my practice to fathers/husbands.
When did I say that I didn't want hunt to be first? I asked what reason he could present to be first. You can't even build a straw-man properly.
Then you're wasting time. Do you care if hunt is the first person to receive payment from a popped fighters purse?
Everytime you tag me in a Mark Hunt thread I get triggered
Ha, there you go. You tried to slip by by asking "did I ever say..." No, you didn't type it, but you heavily implied it... So now after asked you have a non-answer
Racial slurs lol
Ooooh he said white boy! We cant say that about black people so what he said is the same and im gonna go cry about #alllivesmatter
If you havent gotten it yet, Mark Hunt doesnt give a quarter of a fuck
I said numerous times I don't care. You seem to extrapolate from my asking why hunt is the one who should the precedent that I think he doesn't deserve it. If there's any implication there, it's because you put it there yourself. I'm appalled that there's no policy in place already, but I'm not going to arbitrarily pick hunt as the guy who sets the precedent.Ha, there you go. You tried to slip by by asking "did I ever say..." No, you didn't type it, but you heavily implied it... So now after asked you have a non-answer
You got caught
He's not more deserving. He's deserving. you are being really emotional and immature with a grudge against hunt for some reasonI said numerous times I don't care. You seem to extrapolate from my asking why hunt is the one who should the precedent that I think he doesn't deserve it. If there's any implication there, it's because you put it there yourself. I'm appalled that there's no policy in place already, but I'm not going to arbitrarily pick hunt as the guy who sets the precedent.
Hunt's only claims for being allocated Brock's money have been outlandish and unfounded, so again I ask why he is more deserving than anybody else who has been is his situation. You won't answer this though.
you are crazy if you think this is the best way to go about it. If UFC wants to, they can lock him up in court for a long time since he is still under contract and he will be unable to earn any money. If he wanted out he should have gone about it in a rational way behind the scenes
Being more mature than a sherdogger is nothing to brag aboutSherdog as a collective has zero grounds on which to judge people on shit they say. At least Hunt is not hiding behind anonymity. Sherdog has one of the biggest collections of cowards and haters i've ever seen on message boards.
He won't get out with a USADA suspension for refusal to test. UFC can just let him sit out for 9 months-2 years depending on the suspension length and that's that.
I'm actually the only one being objective here.He's not more deserving. He's deserving. you are being really emotional and immature with a grudge against hunt for some reason
He's not, but once he gets the ball rolling future fighters will be with him in getting part of their opponent's purse for cheating. I however have not seen one compelling argument against why a fighter is fined a large percentage of his purse to his opponent for not making weight but not fined any more to his opponent for cheating.He absolutely can. I've just not seen any compelling argument that he should. Why is he more appropriate than anybody else?