- Joined
- Dec 9, 2012
- Messages
- 31,918
- Reaction score
- 15,873
Who are you to define what abuse is in someone else's household?
what hunt was saying about UFC and Lesnar is verbal abuse no matter how you cut it lol, you clearly aren't a parent.
Who are you to define what abuse is in someone else's household?
Oh geeze, you trump supporter, listen up. It doesn't matter why hunt cares now, your whole argument is invalid. Hunt doesn't matter.You must associate with shitty people if they're indifferent to drunk driving until it involves them, but I digress. That's a false equivalency anyway, as this isn't hunt's first rodeo with an opponent on drugs.
Hunt has never had an issue beating fighters who went on to pop as well as fighting in offs with no testing (sometimes against people with a history of use), but when he loses to Brock and he pops, suddenly he's concerned about getting beaten to death during the fight? Lol no.
Indeed! He would look less of a Cunto if he didn't open his big fat mouth. Only makes matter worse rather than helping him. He's just trying to get more dough but thats highly unlikely going to happen. And to make matters worse Bork doesn't need UFC sadly Mark cant say the same.Lol agreed. Even off the juice he's still a big guy, and like you said he would still wrestlefuck him. The guy was what 100 something wins to 4 losses or something in college wrestling. Monster lol.
I don't have an issue with fining them for drug test failures; in fact, I'm surprised that it wasn't implemented with the USADA testing. That doesn't change that hunt only started campaigning for this when his opponent made $2.5 million; suddenly he feels as if he should set the precedent.Oh geeze, you trump supporter, listen up. It doesn't matter why hunt cares now, your whole argument is invalid. Hunt doesn't matter.
What matters is when people cheat with drugs , instead of their fine funding commissions at least a portion should fund the fighter who he cheated against... Similar to how we handle fat fighters
Hunt is right though, something should be done and nobody seems to give a fuck
It's maddening when you see people just give no fucks about wrongdoings
I don't have an issue with fining them for drug test failures; in fact, I'm surprised that it wasn't implemented with the USADA testing. That doesn't change that hunt only started campaigning for this when his opponent made $2.5 million; suddenly he feels as if he should set the precedent.
I don't have an issue with fining people who fail drug tests, but I'll call a spade a spade and say that hunt is full of shit here.
That's the only reason he wants to be first. I don't care who's first, but what reason had hunt presented other than hyperbole? Notice that you haven't actually tried to refute that point.Lol so you don't want hunt to be first because you don't want him to get a chunk of that 2.5 mil! Hahahahaha
When has anybody gotten part or all of his opponents pay after they popped? Why should hunt be the first?
Lol , you don't see how hypocritical you're being?That's the only reason he wants to be first. I don't care who's first, but what reason had hunt presented other than hyperbole? Notice that you haven't actually tried to refute that point.
Do you want to discuss this without logical fallacies?
Refer to some of my other posts in this thread. I'm not against such a policy by any means, but I'm not going to ignore that hunt suddenly felt as if drug use put his life in danger when his opponent happened to make a record disclosed payment.He won't be the first to get paid by a cheating opponent, but why shouldn't he be the last who doesn't get a cut of a cheating opponent's purse? If fighting a guy who is a few pounds over weight entitles you to ten or twenty percent of their purse, then them failing the pre or post fight steroid screenings should entitle you to the same. It would be a very sensible policy, and it's stupid that such a policy has not yet been implemented.
Of course, rules like that are not made ex post facto, so it's clear that Hunt will get nothing. But I hope Hunt complains enough that the next guy inn his position does get paid.
Refer to some of my other posts in this thread. I'm not against such a policy by any means, but I'm not going to ignore that hunt suddenly felt as if drug use put his life in danger when his opponent happened to make a record disclosed payment.
Sherdog as a collective has zero grounds on which to judge people on shit they say. At least Hunt is not hiding behind anonymity. Sherdog has one of the biggest collections of cowards and haters i've ever seen on message boards.Crazy to think that a 40yo father is acting that way
what hunt was saying about UFC and Lesnar is verbal abuse no matter how you cut it lol, you clearly aren't a parent.
When did I say that I didn't want hunt to be first? I asked what reason he could present to be first. You can't even build a straw-man properly.Lol , you don't see how hypocritical you're being?
If you "didn't care who's first" then you wouldn't care if hunt was first and you would want change because the system needs changing. But you are applying a whole new level of bias and saying , "yes I want change but not if its going to benefit hunt... Let's start after hunt because I'm jealous that hunt is going to get too much money"
Hajahajaha
But who are you to define what abuse is in someone else's household?