Can we finally admit ufc ranks are s**t?

CrimsonFan

Gold Belt
@Gold
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
23,202
Reaction score
8,447
We dont even know who the fuckin champ is... Its fuckin retarded.

The one person who actually has claim to the #1 spot is the one person nobody is talking about.


Eddie Alvarez was the undisputed #1.

Since then..

Conor won, but never came back.

Its been a year


Somehow Tony who in the fuck leapfrogs Eddie while Eddie beats an 18 0 Gateche by KO


What?

He beat Kevin fuckin Lee....


But you dipshits just eat it


Khabib honestly should have been #1 years ago.. But he cant fight once a year.

Beating Barboza and Ragin Al doesnt come near beating Porier, RDA, and Gateche





The lw champ is Eddie. The ufc cant control these things.

Maybe its not right.. But neither are bs gift belts
 
People want them to matter so that they have yet another thing to bitch about.

Rankings don't matter
 
Ufc ranking has been a joke even sicne greats have been busted for roids. The ranking system is in place right now as a makerting tool for some of you idiots like the ones who thought Ronda was elite.
 
The way the UFC makes fights and the idea of rankings just don't work together.
 
Rankings are based on past achievement rather than activity.

Guys like Gus are ranked #1 despite rarely fighting. To me, #1 contender should always be the person fighting next for the title. If you lose a title, you should drop to #2. If you challenge for a title and lose, you should drop to #3.

Joanna will still be ranked #1 despite losing to Rose and that's not how rankings should work.
 
Their rankings have always been a joke and I no longer waste my time trying to read or understand them.
 
I don't think anybody follows or cares about them, but sure we'll FINALLY admit that they are shit.
 
Rankings are based on past achievement rather than activity.

Guys like Gus are ranked #1 despite rarely fighting. To me, #1 contender should always be the person fighting next for the title. If you lose a title, you should drop to #2. If you challenge for a title and lose, you should drop to #3.

Joanna will still be ranked #1 despite losing to Rose and that's not how rankings should work.
Where do you rank her then? Under girls she easily beat?



Imo shes e
asily 3. And i dont need to see her bust up cuties face up again to justify
 
The rankings aren't the problem. Having a ranking system is a good thing. The problem is that the rankings lack legitimacy because the UFC doesn't actually them. They're too concerned with making money fights, pushing fighters who appeal to certain markets, and creating unnecessary interim belts.
 
Back
Top