- Joined
- Apr 22, 2007
- Messages
- 80,676
- Reaction score
- 9,818
The other thread was a huge disappointment.
It instantly devolved into an attack on Noons and how 'he isn't a real boxer'.
I expected more from you Boxing guys.
I respect Boxing, and I admit I don't know as much about it as I do BJJ for example.
So do any of you guys know the game? Can you explain to me why the fight played out the way it did, from a technical standpoint? I'm not looking for an attack on Noons' boxing record. I want to understand the striking. Why did Diaz's unorthodox style work so well? Why did Noons have so much more success than most people against Diaz?
It was a great fight, basically a draw imo, and the lack of a breakdown from an honest and intelligent Boxing expert disturbs me.
Put the Boxing vs. MMA bullshit aside for a moment and just break down the striking in the fight, someone.
It instantly devolved into an attack on Noons and how 'he isn't a real boxer'.
I expected more from you Boxing guys.
I respect Boxing, and I admit I don't know as much about it as I do BJJ for example.
So do any of you guys know the game? Can you explain to me why the fight played out the way it did, from a technical standpoint? I'm not looking for an attack on Noons' boxing record. I want to understand the striking. Why did Diaz's unorthodox style work so well? Why did Noons have so much more success than most people against Diaz?
It was a great fight, basically a draw imo, and the lack of a breakdown from an honest and intelligent Boxing expert disturbs me.
Put the Boxing vs. MMA bullshit aside for a moment and just break down the striking in the fight, someone.
Last edited: