1. Guest, The MS Paint Shoop Thread v5 is up! Red Block» | Blue Block»
Violence/Genocide: Do not condone violence or genocide on a person or group of people. You are free to attack a person or groups ideas but you are crossing the line when calling for violence. This will be heavily enforced in threads with breaking news involving victims.

Law California Imposing (Unconstitutional) Gender Quotas on All Corporate Boardrooms

Discussion in 'The War Room' started by Arkain2K, Sep 4, 2018.

  1. Arkain2K Si vis pacem, para bellum

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2010
    Messages:
    29,176
    Likes Received:
    313
    I'm pretty sure government-mandated gender quotas are Unconstitutional o_O

    What say you @alanb @Quipling @Zankou ?

    California moves closer to requiring women in boardrooms

    By Rebecca Aydin | Aug. 29, 2018

    [​IMG]

    California is one step closer to becoming the first state to mandate that women be included in corporate boardrooms with the passage of SB826 through the Assembly today.

    The bill requires that publicly traded California companies instate at least one woman on their boards of directors by the end of 2019. By 2021, this requirement expands to two women for five-member boards and three women for boards of six or more members.

    The bill passed the Assembly 41-21 on Wednesday and will return to the Senate for a concurrence vote before the legislative session ends on Friday at midnight. If it clears the Senate, the bill will go to the desk of Gov. Jerry Brown, who will have one month to sign it.

    More than two dozen organizations officially oppose the bill, stating in a coalition letter that it prioritizes a single element of diversity and violates the U.S. constitution.

    Only 15.8 percent of board seats in publicly traded California companies included in the Russell 3000 index belong to women, according to Bloomberg. Locally, more than one out of five directors of companies headquartered in San Francisco were women, while companies based in Santa Clara, San Mateo and Alameda counties were close to the national average, according to a report by Board Governance Research.

    “We need to see women in these leadership positions. It creates a more realistic view of what women are capable of doing. It’s also good for the businesses,” said the bill’s author, State Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson, D-Santa Barbara.

    https://www.sfchronicle.com/busines...to-requiring-women-in-13191597.php?source=nlp
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2018
  2. Fugazy Aka Ferrari Houseshoes

    Joined:
    May 26, 2012
    Messages:
    8,778
    Likes Received:
    1,476
    Location:
    Knives and animal carcasses. Home.
  3. Orgasmo Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2013
    Messages:
    11,381
    Likes Received:
    1,557
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Fight sexism by imposing sexism? Bit of an insult to women who made it on these boards through their own merits ain't it?
     
  4. Cubo de Sangre President of the War Room

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2014
    Messages:
    44,805
    Likes Received:
    3,448
    Location:
    Hell
    Especially when you can't spot one from the other. :eek:
     
  5. Arkain2K Si vis pacem, para bellum

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2010
    Messages:
    29,176
    Likes Received:
    313
    California Moves to Impose Unconstitutional Gender Quotas for Corporate Boards
    By Hans Bader | September 4, 2018

    [​IMG]

    California’s legislature has passed a law requiring gender quotas for corporate boards in that state. The Sacramento Bee reports:

    “Publicly traded companies based in California would be required to appoint women to the board of directors under a measure on its way to Gov. Jerry Brown’s desk.

    “The bill mandates that corporate boards include at least one woman by the end of 2019 and as many as three by the end of 2021, depending on size. Companies that fail to comply could face a fine up to $300,000 from the California Secretary of State.

    “The Senate approved the bill 23 to 9 to send it to Brown on Thursday. The Assembly narrowly passed the proposal with the bare minimum 41 votes a day earlier …

    “The California Chamber of Commerce opposes the measure, and says it … requires companies to discriminate against qualified men and violates the independent voting rights of corporate boards.”


    Courts have struck down gender-balance requirements for government boards, concluding that they are illegal quotas that violate the Constitution’s equal protection clause. See, e.g., Back v. Carter, 933 F.Supp. 738 (N.D. Ind. 1996).

    They also have struck down requirements that regulated entities (such as private companies) to adopt racial or sexual quotas, or gender-balance requirements, governing their own workforces. See, e.g., Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod v. FCC, 141 F.3d 344 (D.C. Cir. 1998).

    Courts also have also rejected the argument that “diversity” justifies gender quotas. See, e.g., Lamprecht v. FCC, 958 F.3d 382 (D.C. Cir. 1992).

    The California Constitution’s equal-protection clause also forbids racial and sexual proportionality requirements. (See Connerly v. State Personnel Board, 92 Cal.App.4th 16 (2001)). And such requirements are at odds with the public policy contained in Article I, Section 31 of the California Constitution, which forbids racial and gender quotas even in the public sector. (See Hi-Voltage Wireworks v. City of San Jose, 12 P.3d 1068 (Cal. 2000)).

    After Norway adopted gender quotas for corporate boards — requiring companies to have boards of directors comprised of at least 40 percent women — large numbers of inexperienced people ended up as corporate directors. “A study by the University of Michigan found that this led to large numbers of inexperienced women being appointed to boards, and that this has seriously damaged those firms’ performance.” As I have explained in the past, claims that gender balance enhances company performance confuse cause and effect.

    Supporters of California’s gender quotas for corporate boards argue that corporate board should reflect the makeup of the society they serve. But as a federal appeals court explained, it is illegal to mandate a quota just “to give a better reflection” of the gender or racial “composition” of the population an employer serves. (See Police Association v. City of New Orleans, 100 F.3d 1159, 1169 (5th Cir. 1996); see also Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469, 507 (1989)).

    https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/...constitutional-gender-quotas-corporate-boards
     
  6. PrinceOfPain Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2009
    Messages:
    14,251
    Likes Received:
    1,304
    Location:
    South Africa
    "It creates a more realistic view of what women are capable of doing."

    If it's more realistic, why isn't it happening on it's own in real life?


    Anyway, employment quotas are disgusting.
     
  7. irish_thug Meme Mod Staff Member Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2007
    Messages:
    39,596
    Likes Received:
    6,286
    Location:
    In a drunken stupor
    Easy solution. Get one of the men on your board to identify as a woman.
     
  8. SiKnSiN Brown Belt

    Joined:
    May 26, 2010
    Messages:
    3,494
    Likes Received:
    7
    Lol absolutely ridiculous.
     
  9. Supereem Black Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2009
    Messages:
    6,700
    Likes Received:
    23
    Location:
    Splash Heaven
    America is a silly place.
     
  10. TheGreatA Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,077
    Likes Received:
    3,051
    Location:
    Finland
    These types of measures are bound to be counter-productive, and will likely reinforce any negative stereotypes that may have existed, due to the hiring of potentially incompetent individuals as a result of their race or gender, rather than competency.

    There are a number of other, much better alternatives to be explored, if you want more women to assume leadership positions.
     
  11. Anung Un Rama Idol of Millions Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    73,183
    Likes Received:
    2,621
    Location:
    Osgiliath
    Boards need to eat.
    [​IMG]
     
  12. Rygu R.I.P. Obie Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2015
    Messages:
    10,403
    Likes Received:
    2,937
    Location:
    Mission B.C.
    Gender based affirmative action. How adorable.

    What a proud day it would be for women.
     
  13. Neph Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,578
    Likes Received:
    399
    madness
     
  14. KnightTemplar Halloween Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    40,643
    Likes Received:
    3,493
    Location:
    Edinburgh
    I don't see a problem with this. Someone has to make the coffee and sandwiches, take notes etc.
     
  15. Makani Ain't Nobody Ever Been Free

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    16,429
    Likes Received:
    655
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    I disagree with the measure, but let's also not pretend those same stereotypes and prejudices haven't played a role in keeping women out of boardrooms, not to mention the general "boys club" mentality. I do think auch a push should come from female consumers though.
     
  16. SmilinDesperado Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2015
    Messages:
    15,658
    Likes Received:
    1,558
    Come on, Cali. I can't defend this shit.
    <{cruzshake}>
     
  17. Wet Blanket Cultural globalist yt from Canada.

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2017
    Messages:
    6,894
    Likes Received:
    1,812
    Location:
    Toronto
    Gotta break up the boys clubs somehow.
     
  18. HunterSdVa29 Respect, tho Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2010
    Messages:
    36,452
    Likes Received:
    457
    Location:
    29 Palms (from San Diego)
    so....say military contractors have to have a women on the board?
     
  19. bufetadanacara Black Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,567
    Likes Received:
    464
    This is what happens when government gets too big. They have too many people without anything to do so they need to start making up tasks. Here are your tax dollars at work.

    I think that we should go one step further- at least one lesbian, one gay man, one tranny, one obese person, one bald person, one purple haired person... who am I forgetting?
     
  20. Satsui Ryu Black Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2012
    Messages:
    5,932
    Likes Received:
    175
    Stupid and will likely get shot down at some point.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.