- Joined
- Aug 26, 2003
- Messages
- 30,454
- Reaction score
- 1,651
Walls in history rarely worked, they wont work now. You need effective policies.
Thank you Great A.
Reading through that, it does very strongly suggest that a wall is effective at stopping certain types of activity. This makes me wonder a few things.
For the people who are against the wall, why do you think that the wall will prove ineffective, whereas it seems like the Israeli wall is proving effective? Is the effectiveness skewed/false in some way, or is there some other mitigating factor?
Do you know what the DEA stands for bro? Nobody in Mexico is addicted to heroin like Americans are, honestly nobody can afford it. People can blame Mexico all they want but it's affluent Americans who keep the drug business afloat.
It is actually that simple, think about it some more. Same issue with illegal immigration. Penalize the businesses who hire undocumented workers and the "problem" goes away.
Sure go tell the heroin addict down the street to just stop buying drugs.
...You think this is the only tunnel? There are thousands everywhere and much deeper...
...There are thousands of tunnels..
Before this thread devolves into the piece of burning garbage the OP probably wants it to, does anyone have any data on the effects of border barriers on immigration in other parts of the world? Would be nice to frame this discussion in terms of data rather than the torrent of talking points we're about to have in here.
the u.s. in reality doesn't want illegal immigration to stop. u.s. corporations make too much money on paying illegals lower wages than actual citizens. all the shit politicians say against immigration is put out there to deceive the public. people actually think that it's not possible to stop illegal immigration? really? if the will to stop illegal immigration was actually there, not one illegal immigrant would enter the united states.
the immigrants are being sent a message that it is perfectly okay to bypass legal processes through illegal methods.
Damn, this is the kind of reality that makes liberals salty as a cracker:
Suicide bombings have decreased since the construction of the barrier.[7][48] Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, Hamas, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad have been less able to conduct attacks in Israel, which have decreased in areas where the barrier has been completed.[49][50]
The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Israel Security Agency report that in 2002, there were 452 fatalities from terrorist attacks. Before the completion of the first continuous segment (July 2003) from the beginning of the Second Intifada, 73 Palestinian suicide bombings were carried out from the West Bank, killing 293 Israelis and injuring over 1,900. After the completion of the first continuous segment through the end of 2006, there were only 12 attacks based in the West Bank, killing 64 people and wounding 445.[6] Terrorist attacks declined in 2007[6] and 2008[51] to 9 in 2010.[52]
Damn, this is the kind of reality that makes liberals salty as a cracker:
Before this thread devolves into the piece of burning garbage the OP probably wants it to, does anyone have any data on the effects of border barriers on immigration in other parts of the world? Would be nice to frame this discussion in terms of data rather than the torrent of talking points we're about to have in here.
Maybe if the US respected laws of other countries, especially in Latin America, the idea of legal sanctity would carry more substance.
I have trouble understanding how someone steps foot in his neighbor's house and does whatever the fuck he pleases, then turns around and expects other people to all of a sudden follow rules at his home.