- Joined
- Jul 22, 2012
- Messages
- 17,264
- Reaction score
- 6,141
It really was a great fight. Brook pre-Golovkin would have won in my opinion.
Ah I dont know dude? It’s the body work that did the damage in the end. I think there’s little doubt that it would’ve been close and gone 12, but I think spence would’ve still taken over at the mid way point. Brook would’ve beaten the other champions pre golovkin, I’ve little doubt about that. Spence is that little bit better though, imo
facing GGG was pretty dumb, but defending against spence was the right thing to do overall. he was the champ and spence deserved his shot.Really dumb for him to fight GGG. Following up with Spence was pretty dumb too.
Maybe he just wanted to cash out? But if so, why not just fight Khan?
Really dumb for him to fight GGG. Following up with Spence was pretty dumb too.
Maybe he just wanted to cash out? But if so, why not just fight Khan?
Would have been great if we could have seen it. Do you think Brook can get himself up for one last shot at a big fight?
Khan was never ever going to fight Brook. That was an impossible fight to make.Really dumb for him to fight GGG. Following up with Spence was pretty dumb too.
Maybe he just wanted to cash out? But if so, why not just fight Khan?
Somehow people diss Brook for losing to a killer at MW and a beast at WW.
He's an outstanding 12 round boxerI personally didn't see the fight all that close, thought Spence was taking his time more than anything, fighting a 12 round fight.
I never really understood the Brook criticism. He was game in every fight I ever saw him in.Somehow people diss Brook for losing to a killer at MW and a beast at WW.
It might be because he has the worst nickname for a signature punch. That "Chocolate Brownie" bullshitI never really understood the Brook criticism. He was game in every fight I ever saw him in.