International British Special Forces Alleged to Regularly Execute Civilians in Afghanistan

[Orgasmo]

That's pretty fucked up, behaving like Red Coats did during colonial times.

At the height of the war in Afghanistan in 2011, two senior officers from Special Forces met in a bar in Dorset to have a secret conversation. They feared some of the UK's most highly-trained troops had adopted a "deliberate policy" of illegally killing unarmed men. Evidence is now emerging that suggests they were right.

Special Forces are the UK's elite specialist troops, encompassing both the SAS (Special Air Service) and the SBS (Special Boat Service).

It follows a BBC Panorama programme last year, which reported on the deaths. The programme worked with the Sunday Times Insight team to reveal evidence of a pattern of illegal killings by UK Special Forces.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-53597137

 

[AgonyandIrony]

That's pretty fucked up, behaving like Red Coats did during colonial times.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-53597137

The SAS used shoot to kill policies in Northern Ireland during the Troubles. Sounds like an extension of it.

 

[4daLuLZ]

Uh Oh........Afghan Mel Gibson's probably on the rampage there now.

 

[Islam Imamate]

An internal email requests a copy of the OPSUM within hours of the killings and asks: "Is this about [redacted] latest massacre!"

The reply includes a summary of the unlikely events in the official report and concludes by saying: "You couldn't MAKE IT UP!"

It looks as if the soldiers reading these reports had concerns that they were being falsified using near-identical cover stories.

Let sigh. The Afghanistan situation was different and basically doesn't have anything similar to it in the modern age.
The US executed it pretty well, with minimal civilian loses. The taliban was an awful warlord extremist group.

 

[Bacco]

Anybody is surprised?
People thinking "good guys" just go there and fight terrorists live in fairytales world

 

[ElKarlo]

Oh fuk off already. I meant that about the initial invasion. I said multiple times that the occupation was problematic and I didn't have an answer to how to do.it effectively. I also said that I was iffy on the invasion. And that the Taliban was awful and was sheltering a mass murderer.
So this call out is obnoxious and uncalled for. Due to your flat out refusal to debate on what should have been done about Afghanistan

 

[oldshadow]

So if I understand this they identified enemies and then terminated them.

 

[Anaconda99]

British are the best at scoffing at other nations while doing worse things.

 

[Islam Imamate]

Oh fuk off already. I meant that about the initial invasion. I said multiple times that the occupation was problematic and I didn't have an answer to how to do.it effectively. I also said that I was iffy on the invasion. And that the Taliban was awful and was sheltering a mass murderer.

Haha, chill bruh just ribbing you a bit. No need to get so hot and bothered, at the end of the day its not your family that got executed in the middle of the night by coalition forces.

So this call out is obnoxious and uncalled for. Due to your flat out refusal to debate on what should have been done about Afghanistan

I mean, I responded to all your points and then you vanished. Fair enough, you don't owe me a response or your time and there are many good reasons not to spend time on Sherdog. But don't lie about the exchange bruh, people can click that quote and go see that you're being dishonest. Seems like a bad habit you have, should work on that.

So if I understand this they identified enemies and then terminated them.

Uh, no you're not understanding it. Like not even close, at all.

British are the best at scoffing at other nations while doing worse things.

Yeah exactly, like how during the two WW and inter-war period they criticized Germany and Japan extensively for imperialism.
British: "People have a right to self-determination!"

Indians: "Okay so what about us?"

British "Y-You don't count, don't be cheeky!"

 

[ElKarlo]

No, you skipped over my major points and ignored them, despite me asking you what you would have done. I think I wrote that 2-3 times. I am not going to respond if you you won't take a stance. As it means only I have to defend my position

 

[Anaconda99]

Haha, chill bruh just ribbing you a bit. No need to get so hot and bothered, at the end of the day its not your family that got executed in the middle of the night by coalition forces.

I mean, I responded to all your points and then you vanished. Fair enough, you don't owe me a response or your time and there are many good reasons not to spend time on Sherdog. But don't lie about the exchange bruh, people can click that quote and go see that you're being dishonest. Seems like a bad habit you have, should work on that.

Uh, no you're not understanding it. Like not even close, at all.

Yeah exactly, like how during the two WW and inter-war period they criticized Germany and Japan extensively for imperialism.
British: "People have a right to self-determination!"

Indians: "Okay so what about us?"

British "Y-You don't count, don't be cheeky!"

Would like but have none left. They only cared about nazis once they realised they were coming for them sooner or later. Brits sympathized with the nazis. The royal family have taken pictures with the sieg hail sign.

 

[Andrei Orlovski]

And MSM says Putin pays Taliban to kill Americans. Imagine thinking a foreign country has to pay people to kill invaders who murder their family.

 

[AgonyandIrony]

British are the best at scoffing at other nations while doing worse things.

They tried to get the UVF to shoot up a school in Northern Ireland as well and worked closely with Loyalist paramilitaries. They also regularly engaged in torture, and the SAS worked with the special division of the RUC to torture and imprison people. The treatment of political prisoners was horrendous as well.

But yeah, this shouldn't surprise anyone, the Union Jack is a fancy name for the Butchers Apron.

I love that Churchill is regarded as some fucking hero despite his actions not only in the Anglo-Irish War but his policies caused the Bengal Famine, a fun little topic the Anglos never want to address for some reason.

 

[Anaconda99]

They tried to get the UVF to shoot up a school in Northern Ireland as well and worked closely with Loyalist paramilitaries. They also regularly engaged in torture, and the SAS worked with the special division of the RUC to torture and imprison people. The treatment of political prisoners was horrendous as well.

But yeah, this shouldn't surprise anyone, the Union Jack is a fancy name for the Butchers Apron.

I love that Churchill is regarded as some fucking hero despite his actions not only in the Anglo-Irish War but his policies caused the Bengal Famine, a fun little topic the Anglos never want to address for some reason.

Like. I have no trouble believing you. They also get off that they have a queen knighting people as if its feww hundred years back. They use to knight people who went to war now they changed it to pedophiles.

 

[AgonyandIrony]

Like. I have no trouble believing you. They also get off that they have a queen knighting people as if its feww hundred years back. They use to knight people who went to war now they changed it to pedophiles.

Irish history is a history of Anglo genocide and ethnic cleansing. The potato famine was a fucking genocide.

The Bengal Famine killed more people than Hitler and it was all Churchills fault. The idea of British soldiers historically being these honorable people is bullshit. They reprimanded their soldiers who wanting to feed children so they didn't starve to death.

While we're talking about the British SAS it's important to remember the war crimes of the Australian SAS.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.nine.com.au/article/47d85ab2-c54d-42f9-b3ce-350dba24731f

 

[Islam Imamate]

They use to knight people who went to war now they changed it to pedophiles.

 

[hillelslovak87]

The righties here are the people who lapped up right wing propaganda FOR YEARS regarding the Nisour Square Massacre, where countless bs narratives were spun on Fox and other outlets, and they allllllways spoke of the professionalism oh the professionalism!! They had to mow civilians down!!

 

[Anaconda99]

Much hero, very heroe

 

[oldshadow]

Haha, chill bruh just ribbing you a bit. No need to get so hot and bothered, at the end of the day its not your family that got executed in the middle of the night by coalition forces.

I mean, I responded to all your points and then you vanished. Fair enough, you don't owe me a response or your time and there are many good reasons not to spend time on Sherdog. But don't lie about the exchange bruh, people can click that quote and go see that you're being dishonest. Seems like a bad habit you have, should work on that.

Uh, no you're not understanding it. Like not even close, at all.

Yeah exactly, like how during the two WW and inter-war period they criticized Germany and Japan extensively for imperialism.
British: "People have a right to self-determination!"

Indians: "Okay so what about us?"

British "Y-You don't count, don't be cheeky!"

So they were just killing random people just for the fun of it. The article didn't say that as far as I could tell.

 

[Islam Imamate]

No, you skipped over my major points and ignored them, despite me asking you what you would have done. I think I wrote that 2-3 times. I am not going to respond if you you won't take a stance. As it means only I have to defend my position

Still lying about it? You do realize people can go to that thread and see what I wrote right? In case you missed the post, here it is. In short, I said we should've invaded Afghanistan since as a nation-state they have to take responsibility for harboring terrorists.

So they were just killing random people just for the fun of it. The article didn't say that as far as I could tell.

Uh, did you actually read the article? Because it kind of did point that out...