- Joined
- Feb 1, 2016
- Messages
- 101
- Reaction score
- 0
First off, I wanna say I am not a fan of Stann as a fighter, nor as a person.
I just don't like him in general.
But the last two days with Stann in commentary has really made me realize how good he is with it compared to Joe Roidgain. He is techical, he doesn't pick favorites, and actually points out the goods in both fighters strategies.
Unlike Rogan he doesn't pose silly questions to why the fighter isn't throwing more kick/more TDs/more strikes etc. He calls the fight as it is, and through both events, he completely said what I was thinking.
Nice, balanced and unbiased commentary... only problem was Anik.
Anyone here agree/disagree?
I just don't like him in general.
But the last two days with Stann in commentary has really made me realize how good he is with it compared to Joe Roidgain. He is techical, he doesn't pick favorites, and actually points out the goods in both fighters strategies.
Unlike Rogan he doesn't pose silly questions to why the fighter isn't throwing more kick/more TDs/more strikes etc. He calls the fight as it is, and through both events, he completely said what I was thinking.
Nice, balanced and unbiased commentary... only problem was Anik.
Anyone here agree/disagree?
Last edited: