Huge, if true
I believe him.
In actuality, Nick Diaz laying down in the middle of the fight was done to infuriate Anderson by making fun of his inability to not get it up.
The rules don't allow for exoneration due to tainted supplements. If a banned substance was legit in your system then you broke the rules. Doesn't matter if you say you took it accidentally.Well they said they tested the viagra and came back positive. If they can show this to be true I'm not sure how he's not exonerated. .
The rules don't allow for exoneration due to tainted supplements. If a banned substance was legit in your system then you broke the rules. Doesn't matter if you say you took it accidentally.
Well they said they tested the viagra and came back positive. If they can show this to be true I'm not sure how he's not exonerated. .
Seriously?
Why would the AC take him at his word that this particular bottle of viagra is what he was taking? And if it was, that he didn't just squirt some testosterone onto the previously untainted pills?
And even if they take him at his word there, that still doesn't get him off the hook for testing positive.
If your reasoning works, then anyone who tests positive just has to somehow get their hands on a bottle of tainted stuff that also tests positive, and say that was was what they were taking and boom, exonerated.
WADA believed La Shawn Merritt's story that he wasn't doping but in fact taking a penis enlargement pill. His sentence was massively reduced.
Seriously?
Why would the AC take him at his word that this particular bottle of viagra is what he was taking? And if it was, that he didn't just squirt some testosterone onto the previously untainted pills?
And even if they take him at his word there, that still doesn't get him off the hook for testing positive.
If your reasoning works, then anyone who tests positive just has to somehow get their hands on a bottle of tainted stuff that also tests positive, and say that was was what they were taking and boom, exonerated.