- Joined
- Mar 14, 2016
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey, I've been trainning in Muay Thai for a few months now. I train 2-3 times a week, and I already feel myself getting better at it. I am doing this as a hobby, and my purpose is to eventually build a solid self defense ability and incorporate martial arts into my training (I also do strength and cardio).
As a side note:
I know there are many debates on how effective martial arts are for self defense, I don't want to get into that argument. My dad is alive today only because he knew how to fight in his younger days, otherwise I wouldn't be born. So to me that's a good enough indicator as to how martial arts can increase your chances, let's leave it at that.
I started in MMA but decided I rather learn striking first, then proceed to learn groundwork. Eventually I plan on going back to MMA after a year or so in Muay Thai. I also plan on integrating Krav Maga at some point, after I feel competent in MMA.
I was wondering about something:
It seems that Boxing focuses well on hands and footwork, and I am considering whether I should take Boxing for 6-12 months before going back to MMA. I would like to develop a good hand technique and strong punches.
Also, this may not be accurate, but still:
When I was training in MMA I felt that I learned too much of everything at once, and eventually made little progress. We had half session devoted to striking and half session devoted to ground, and I felt I didn't get better at either. At Muay Thai I get the feeling I am getting better at it, because we focus on striking only. So using the same login, I think that I may benefit a lot from focusing solely on hand technique.
However, when I asked a friend who is a full time MMA fighter about taking BJJ for a year to build ground technique, and he said that I should go straight to MMA and that it would be a waste of time.
What do you think? Should I try taking Boxing for 6-12 months after 12+ months in Muay Thai? Or would it be a waste of time and I should head straight back to MMA?
As a side note:
I know there are many debates on how effective martial arts are for self defense, I don't want to get into that argument. My dad is alive today only because he knew how to fight in his younger days, otherwise I wouldn't be born. So to me that's a good enough indicator as to how martial arts can increase your chances, let's leave it at that.
I started in MMA but decided I rather learn striking first, then proceed to learn groundwork. Eventually I plan on going back to MMA after a year or so in Muay Thai. I also plan on integrating Krav Maga at some point, after I feel competent in MMA.
I was wondering about something:
It seems that Boxing focuses well on hands and footwork, and I am considering whether I should take Boxing for 6-12 months before going back to MMA. I would like to develop a good hand technique and strong punches.
Also, this may not be accurate, but still:
When I was training in MMA I felt that I learned too much of everything at once, and eventually made little progress. We had half session devoted to striking and half session devoted to ground, and I felt I didn't get better at either. At Muay Thai I get the feeling I am getting better at it, because we focus on striking only. So using the same login, I think that I may benefit a lot from focusing solely on hand technique.
However, when I asked a friend who is a full time MMA fighter about taking BJJ for a year to build ground technique, and he said that I should go straight to MMA and that it would be a waste of time.
What do you think? Should I try taking Boxing for 6-12 months after 12+ months in Muay Thai? Or would it be a waste of time and I should head straight back to MMA?
Last edited: