Probably not. I'm not a bleeding heart on matters of race, I don't even know what that means. We have race issues. Either we address the historical record honestly or we hide behind stereotypes to deflect from the seriousness of it's impact. I think addressing it is the proper course of action. But whether we have race issues or not doesn't change the economics of how things works.
That some people call addressing the race stuff as liberal surprises me because I would assume we're all against racism where it exists. To simplify, most of the social issues around race are traceable to centuries old economic policies directed at creating and managing an economic underclass.
If I tell someone that he can't go to college and that his kids can't go to college and neither can his grandkids or I'm killing them all then I'm an idiot if I'm surprised that his great-grandkids don't go to college either. I'm a bigger idiot if I look at 3 generations of people who don't go to college, on fear of violent retribution, and then say "See, they don't value college." It's insane, to me, that people ignore the decades of social/economic conditioning that preceded the civil rights act in judging the post-civil rights act behaviors.