as visible as a home-cooked decision can be
From the postfight show. I found it amusing how these "company men"were being so candid. Especially given their tongue-in-cheek breakdown of how Ross lost. Gil saying he won because he fought in Albuquerque and threw wildly to sell it to the judges and crowd.
It was bad enough that incompetence can only partially explain it. I am curious whether the two judges who scored it for Sanchez had family members betting heavily on Sanchez.
Its unbelievable how Diego manages to say he won with a straight face after every robbery.
Is there anything Pearson can do in this situation? Can this decision be looked at and reversed? This is completely fucked up and it'd really suck if Pearson had to eat shit on this deal and take a loss when he clearly won.
And what does Bisping think about his decision vs Matt Hammil?
A 9-9 round can only happen when a fighter wins the round but gets a point taken away.
Cause Dana has never said anything bad about the judging system of MMA, right?
I think the complete opposite. if u don't make a big deal about it, it looks like u don't care about your product. trying to push the bs on the general public isn't going to work
A 9-9 round can only happen when a fighter wins the round but gets a point taken away.
I thought Kenny ' s commentary was lopsided toward pearson; not the worst decision I've seen, but I'm a big proponent of 10-10 and 9-9 rounds though
Practice makes perfect.
He's made an official complaint but it's more of a symbolic gesture as he's got no chance of overturning the decision.
Maybe if you actually followed MMA you'd know he said after losing a controversial decision to Rashad "I got a lucky decision against Hammill I guess it's my time to be on the other end this time"