- Joined
- Jul 14, 2013
- Messages
- 10,887
- Reaction score
- 237
P4P is fine, people just need to realize there isn't a clear cut way to decide on real rankings, it's pretty clear to see a guy like Dominic Cruz is a better fighter than a low end heavyweight fighter despite the fact if they were to really fight the mediocre heavyweight would win with the physical advantages to compensate for his lack of skill.Wheres the "p4p doesnt exist and is stupid as fuck to argue about" option
Same place as the 'if you don't like p4p discussions why do you keep entering p4p threads?' option.Wheres the "p4p doesnt exist and is stupid as fuck to argue about" option
lol Bisping probably isn't even the 5th best MW.
DAMNNNN!!!!!!Same place as the 'if you don't like p4p discussions why do you keep entering p4p threads?' option.
>implying i stay for more than one postSame place as the 'if you don't like p4p discussions why do you keep entering p4p threads?' option.
yeah but i made you stay for two. victory is mine.>implying i stay for more than one post
yeah the p4p ranking on most websites I've seen were usually pretty crumby, it was normally all the champions and then with some remaining spots a couple of contenders that were on a tear.P4P is ok if you don't take it seriously.
The official UFC P4P rankings have never been about p4p though, mostly about division dominance/hype. They had Ronda over TJ ffs.
Therein lies the problem. P4P weirdos try to "decide on real rankings" all the time.P4P is fine, people just need to realize there isn't a clear cut way to decide on real rankings, it's pretty clear to see a guy like Dominic Cruz is a better fighter than a low end heavyweight fighter despite the fact if they were to really fight the mediocre heavyweight would win with the physical advantages to compensate for his lack of skill.