- Joined
- Apr 7, 2008
- Messages
- 7,303
- Reaction score
- 0
In response to Oxfam International's finding that
In response to Oxfam International's finding that
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/bill-and-...on-the-future-and-philanthropy-143014670.html
While he does say there is a role for government, he seems to think the lions share of good will come from philanthropy. Isn't this just another spin of trickle down economics?
When pointed out that something is very wrong "we may or may not give something back"
Kind people.
The system is pretty messed up when the top 1% keep sucking in like a blackhole, the money from the rest at a faster rate every year.
The system is pretty messed up when the top 1% keep sucking in like a blackhole, the money from the rest at a faster rate every year.
When pointed out that something is very wrong "we may or may not give something back"
Kind people.
I have mixed feelings about Gates. Absurdly rich on 1 hand, but actually invented and developed something that benefits most of the world. Does do a lot of philantropy.
But has been guilty of trying to monopolize the market. New Microsoft editions is getting ridiculous. I like Word 7 just fine.
Governments haven't conquered poverty so I'm not sure philanthropy could be expected to. At least with philanthropy you've got a better chance the money is going to a good cause rather than war or graft of some sort.
But if people want to tax the shit out of billionaires I'm not going to lose sleep over it.
LOL, most charities are just scams
Why am I not surprised that his example centered around feeding children into the college system, as if it's still some sort of guaranteed ticket to prosperity. Most graduates I know are in debt. But I digress.
Philanthropy won't fix the social system or the inequality.
Philanthropy works if you donate large amounts, but most rich people i doubt donate even 1% of their income. Gates is one of the few exceptions to this
If everyone has a degree then the separation and differentation between potential candidates doesn't exist. Everyone having degrees doesn't create more high paying jobs unless you teach at a university, just more debt.
If everyone is special then no-one is.
I'm sure a lot of them are but the ones that aren't scams will have a bigger incentive of making sure their donations are actually going to the individuals its meant to. Governments consistently fail at this.
I have mixed feelings about Gates. Absurdly rich on 1 hand, but actually invented and developed something that benefits most of the world. Does do a lot of philantropy.
But has been guilty of trying to monopolize the market. New Microsoft editions is getting ridiculous. I like Word 7 just fine.
Most americans are in debt, college or not. Across all age groups there are major earning gaps between people with even just some college (i.e. less than an associates) versus those with only a HS diploma. Among "millennials" the gap is even more pronounced. That gap grows with each step up in level of education (PhD vs Professional being the only exception).Why am I not surprised that his example centered around feeding children into the college system, as if it's still some sort of guaranteed ticket to prosperity. Most graduates I know are in debt. But I digress.