- Joined
- May 17, 2009
- Messages
- 12,101
- Reaction score
- 7,126
Except he didn't. UFC stats which had no reason to be biased shows Shogun 15 Machida 11 in head strikes total and Machida outstruck Shogun in only 1 round in head strikes.Doesn't he have a point? Why should someone be awarded a win for spamming low kicks for 5 rounds? Machida landed more shots the head
Shogun didn't SPAM leg kicks. He consistently attacked Machida's legs. That resulted in significant strike difference of 80-35 in favour of Shogun. If you take away all leg kicks it becomes 32 Machida and 31 Shogun. Machida landed 3 leg kicks of his 35 significant strikes which is 8.6% of his offense. Shogun landed 49 of 80 significant strikes or 61.25%. I think when those kicks are 61% of a fighters offense in an otherwise dead even fight they certainly make the difference.
The judges are incompetent as Fnck as MMA is not boxing. Striking is the criteria not HEAD STRIKES. Nelson Hamilton gave Machida round 4 when he was outlanded in significant strikes 10-1. The other two judges gave Machida round one when he was outstruck 19-9 significant strikes and 2-1 in head strikes.
All three judges gave Machida rounds 2 and 3 yet in round 2 sig strikes were 21-7 for Shogun and head strikes were 2-1 in favour of Machida. Round 3 sig strikes were 19-12 for Shogun and head strikes were even at 6-6.
Last edited: