- Joined
- Jun 4, 2008
- Messages
- 55,741
- Reaction score
- 28,789
Neither robberies at all, both very close fights, very close fights are not robberies
Yelling doesn't make you right.... do you know that?i get all that- maybe you missed my points:
1. "damage" WAS a scoring criteria, and ive never heard anyone say GSP damaged Hendricks more. his face looked fresh.
2. you cant say "lets not compare Hendricks and GSP" -
THAT IS WHO WAS COMPARED that i quoted.
sure i get scar tissue re opens- GSPS face looks like it went through a wood chipper, and Hendricks doesnt have dark complexion. fighters can LOSE because of a cut- no doctor ever says "it was scar tissue, it doesnt count"
Nate Diaz arguably lost to Mas over scar tissue- damage is damage.
Jon absolutely won the fight.Jones beat Reyes imo. Its been a very long time since I watched GSP vs Hendricks but I think I recall being a little surprised at the decision, but I wouldn't classify it as a robbery. Close fights that go the distance and to the scorecards aren't robberies.
Definitely close and good fights.hendricks and reyes won those fights. close though. so neither are the biggest robberies ever. I think the hendricks robbery was worse tho.
GSP vs Hendricks could've gone either way depending on how you scored round 1.All in the title