Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by Bouboumaster, May 6, 2021.
All in the title
Subjective obviously, but I'd go with GSP-Hendricks.
Neither one was a robbery.
Reyes clearly won.
I thought Hendricks won clearly but GSP did come strong later rounds.
Its Reyes and its not even close. Jones ran after that fight that says it all.
When I heard 49-46 after the Reyes-Jones fight, I was sure Reyes was about to win.
Neither were robberies; it's just that peoble like robberies, they're cool.
Bisping over Hammill was a robbery.
These two are debatable.
Is that the 7th or 8th account from Toner, Bjpenngoat, messiah?
GSP clearly lost and then went into hiding.
Jones won. Reyes did nothing to say that was a “robbery”.
I'd say Jones vs. Reyes by default simply because I don't consider GSP vs. Hendricks to be a robbery (the latter fight was close enough to go either way).
You're laughably biased. In addition to round 2, Hendricks definitively won round 4 while GSP won rounds 3 and 5; personally I scored it a draw.
Fights are not scored based on who bruises or cuts more easily.
I think Hendricks won the fight but he took the last round off like a dumbass.
And what did GSP do after the Hendricks fight? Did he want a rematch?
I am like this clown(ie you) can not be serious....but then I saw your AV.
Sherdog had Bisping winning vs Hamill, as did Fightmetric.
It's one of those fights that has mysteriously become one of the biggest robberys ever, even when it wasn't.
Why? Cuz lots of people have heard is was a robbery. Most people are sheep.
These goofs are so blind by the hate that now the biggest robbery is a fight where niether fighter questioned the decision/outcome.
GSP Hendricks easily. You can make an argument for Jon winning, even if you disagree with it, but you can't for GSP. The only reason GSP won was because 2 judges somehow gave him the first round.
Hendricks and it’s not even close.
Separate names with a comma.